MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4205108795 · doi:10.5812/ans.119236

Endurance Training and Exogenous Adenosine Infusion Mitigate Hippocampal Inflammation and Cell Death in a Rat Model of Cerebral Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury: A Randomized Controlled Trial

2022· article· en· W4205108795 on OpenAlexaff
Zahra Eslami, Masoumeh Rezaei Ghomi, Aref Saidi, Seyedeh Vafa Mousavi, Mahboubeh Farhadi, Najmeh Sheikh Robati, Abdorreza Eghbal Moghanlou, Gerlinde A. S. Metz, Shohreh Sharifian, Seyed Javad Mirghani

Bibliographic record

VenueArchives of Neuroscience · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Lethbridge
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIschemiaAdenosineMedicineAnesthesiaEndurance trainingNeuroprotectionHippocampal formationInternal medicineReperfusion injuryBrain ischemiaEndocrinologyPharmacology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Cerebral ischemia can cause irreversible structural and functional damages to the brain, especially to the hippocampus. Preconditioning with endurance training and endogenous adenosine infusion may reduce ischemia-associated damages. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of preconditioning with endurance training and endogenous adenosine infusion on cell death in the hippocampal CA1 region following ischemia/reperfusion injuries in a rat model. Methods: Male Wistar rats were divided into five groups: (1) control (n = 8); (2) ischemia (n = 12); (3) endurance training + ischemia (n = 12); (4) adenosine infusion + ischemia (n = 12); and (5) endurance training + adenosine infusion + ischemia (n = 12). The rats in the training groups ran on a treadmill five days per week for eight weeks. In the adenosine infusion groups, the rats were injected 0.1 mg/mL/kg of adenosine intraperitoneally. Also, in the ischemic groups, both common carotid arteries were clamped for 45 minutes. Cresyl violet staining and real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay were used to evaluate cell death and cytokine gene expression, respectively. Results: Based on the present results, treatments, including endurance training + ischemia, adenosine infusion + ischemia, and endurance training + adenosine infusion + ischemia reduced the level of interleukin-6 (IL-6) and glutamate gene expression, respectively, compared to the group of ischemia only. In contrast, the expression of nerve growth factor (NGF) and adenosine receptor (A2A) genes increased by seven, four, and two folds in the endurance training + ischemia, adenosine infusion + ischemia, and endurance training + adenosine infusion + ischemia groups, respectively, compared to the group of ischemia only. Conclusions: Endurance training on a treadmill and exogenous adenosine infusion synergistically diminished cell death and reduced the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines, while promoting the neurotrophic factor expression. When endurance training and adenosine infusion were used as stimulants before the induction of cerebral ischemia, they significantly reduced cell death.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchives of NeuroscienceSame topicNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsFrench-language works237,207