MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4205121933 · doi:10.1016/j.aej.2022.01.018

Damage analysis of a CFRP cross-ply laminate subjected to abrasive water jet cutting

2022· article· en· W4205121933 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAlexandria Engineering Journal · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicErosion and Abrasive Machining
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceDelamination (geology)BreakageComposite materialAbrasiveComposite numberJet (fluid)Particle (ecology)Finite element methodFiberStructural engineeringMechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The abrasive water jet (AWJ) cutting technique is one of the promising techniques used in machining of composite materials due to lack of thermal damage, lower tool wear and higher productivity. In this study, the AWJ cutting of a cross-ply CFRP laminate was investigated experimentally and numerically. The purpose is to understand the underlying physics of the AWJ cutting of a composite plate, which can be later used to control the process as well as optimizing its parameters. In the performed tests of the plate with a stacking sequence of [0°/90°/0°/90°] and having a total thickness value of 0.84 mm, where the pressure of particles and impact angle were varied, different failure characteristics such as fiber pull-out, fiber breakage, fiber debonding, matrix cracking and delamination were noticed. A three-dimensional FE model of the process was developed using ABAQUS finite element software to understand the underlying physics. In the model, the pure water jet particles following the linear Hugoniot form of the Mie-Grüneisen equation of state and highly rigid abrasive particles were modelled using smooth particle hydrodynamics. While the three dimensional Hashin damage model was used to simulate the intra ply damage, cohesive zone elements were used to predict the delamination. The damage characteristics in the composite plate was investigated for different process parameters. When the speed of the AWJ particles increased from 300 m/s to 600 m/s, the amount of delamination decreased from 6.44% to 5.69% at the top interface with no more delamination observed at the middle and bottom interfaces. The delamination performance of 0°/90°/0°/90° orientation was found to be better than those of 0°/90°/90°/0° and 0°/0°/90°/90° orientations. The impact angle of the particles affected the material removal rate in the process significantly. The failure behaviour of the laminate subjected to AWJ and pure water jet cuttings (PWJ) were also compared.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.719
Threshold uncertainty score0.992

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it