MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4205135847 · doi:10.1002/mren.202100055

Effects of Poly(propylene glycol)‐Based Triamine on the Sol/Gel Curing and Properties of Hybrid Non‐Isocyanate Polyurethanes

2022· article· en· W4205135847 on OpenAlexafffund
Louis‐Paul Bowman, Georges R. Younes, Milan Marić

Bibliographic record

VenueMacromolecular Reaction Engineering · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicPolymer composites and self-healing
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMcGill University
KeywordsPrepolymerIsocyanateCuring (chemistry)Polymer chemistryDiamineMaterials sciencePolyurethaneAbsorption of waterUltimate tensile strengthSilaneChemistryChemical engineeringComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Non‐isocyanate polyurethanes (NIPUs) synthesized from biodiesel‐derived diglycerol dicarbonate (DGC) and triamine functional poly(propylene glycol) (Jeffamine) are investigated to improve upon poor water resistance and slow curing kinetics observed in (DGC/diamine functional Jeffamine) NIPUs. The structural, thermal, and rheological properties of the prepolymer formulations match those of their diamine‐prepared analog previously reported. The NIPU prepolymers (number average molecular weight, M N between 4200 and 6400 g mol −1 ) are subsequently functionalized with trimethoxy silane end‐cappers to yield moisture‐curable hybrid NIPUs. The prepolymers are both successfully end‐capped and subsequently cured under ambient conditions. The sol/gel curing kinetics of the prepolymers are extensively studied, and the effects of the capping methodology, moisture, and the amount of catalyst are quantified so that gel times are observed in as little as 1.4 h at room temperature. The developed curing methods are effective leading to final hybrid films with high gel contents (>86%). The tensile properties of the final films resulting are considerably better compared to previously reported DGC/Jeffamine‐based NIPUs, which are too soft to undergo mechanical testing. Also, the films are found to exhibit a tenfold decrease in water absorption compared to the latter (5% vs 70%, respectively).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.517

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.181
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMacromolecular Reaction EngineeringSame topicPolymer composites and self-healingFrench-language works237,207