A Multi-Disciplinary Approach to Perianal Fistulizing Crohn's Disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Perianal fistulizing Crohn's disease represents a severe phenotype associated with significant morbidity. Patients with perianal fistulizing disease are more likely to have a severe disease course and have significant reductions in quality of life. Moreover, these patients are at risk for the development of distal rectal and anal cancers. Given the complexity and severity of this patient group, the management of perianal Crohn's disease must be undertaken by a multidisciplinary team. The gastroenterologist and colorectal surgeon play a critical role in the diagnosis and management of perianal fistulizing disease. An examination under anesthesia provides critical information and is an essential part of the work-up of complex perianal fistulas. The radiologist also plays a central role in characterizing anatomy and assessing response to treatment. Several imaging modalities are available for these patients with magnetic resonance imaging as the imaging modality of choice. Perianal disease developing after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis represents a particularly challenging form of fistulizing disease and requires a multidisciplinary clinical and radiologic approach to differentiate surgical complications from recurrent Crohn's disease.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".