Time Series Long-Term Forecasting of per Capita Electricity Consumption for Bangladesh
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bangladesh government has announced Vision-2041 of electricity generation and distribution to uplift the socio-economic conditions of Bangladesh. It is now entering into the list of middle-income countries and now planning for energy as one key measure to sustainable development. Policymakers are trying to forecast the future per capita electricity consumption and set up a feasible way of electricity generation over longer periods for sustainable development of Bangladesh through preventing underestimation or overestimation that could cause a huge loss in the financial sector of Bangladesh. This work focuses on long-term estimation of electricity consumption for Bangladesh, time series models have been used to forecast per capita electricity consumption from fiscal year (FY) 2019/20-2040/41 (next 22 years). An actual past historical data of FY 1976/77-2018/19 (43 years) has been analysed on Minitab 17 to get the most favourable time series model for forecasting per capita electricity consumption of Bangladesh. ARIMA has appeared as the most accurate time series model over the actual historical data of 43 years with the lowest MAPE, MAD, and MSD as 4.50, 3.23, and 15.40, respectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it