MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4205196355 · doi:10.5539/cis.v15n1p66

Dual Fine-Grained Public-Key Searchable Encryption from Lattices

2022· article· en· W4205196355 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Zike Jiang, Shixin Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueComputer and Information Science · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCryptography and Data Security
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceKeyword searchScheme (mathematics)EncryptionAccess controlLearning with errorsKey (lock)Dual (grammatical number)Public-key cryptographyDelegationComputer securityTheoretical computer scienceInformation retrieval

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fine-grained public key encryption with keyword search (PEKS), allowing users to search on encrypted data with flexible access control policy, has been widely studied recently due to its promising application to real-world scenarios such as cloud computing. However, most of the existing fine-grained PEKS schemes are either only able to support single access control (e.g., attribute-based access control) or susceptible to being attacked or compromised by quantum computers in or after a short time. In this paper, we propose a fine-grained PEKS scheme that o ers dual access control based on lattice. In particular, we first define a dual fine-grained PEKS primitive against chosen keyword attacks under selective security. Subsequently, we adapt the key homomorphic technique and noise rerandomization technique to design a concrete scheme. Particularly, the keyword space in our construction is unlimited. Then, we present a formal security proof against chosen keyword attacks on the learning with errors (LWE) problem in the standard model. Moreover, we demonstrate the theoretical performance and experimental result of our proposed scheme. Finally, we discuss that our scheme can be easily extended to support conjunctive keywords and delegation without incurring complex operations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication
Consensus categoriesScholarly communication
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.833
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.018
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueComputer and Information ScienceSame topicCryptography and Data SecurityFrench-language works237,207