MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4205211984 · doi:10.1029/2021jb023002

A Test of the Hypothesis That Syn‐Collisional Felsic Magmatism Contributes to Continental Crustal Growth Via Deep Learning Modeling and Principal Component Analysis of Big Geochemical Datasets

2022· article· en· W4205211984 on OpenAlexaff
Domenico Cicchella, Jun Hong, Ganggang Meng

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsLaurentian University
FundersChang'an University
KeywordsMagmatismContinental crustFelsicGeologyCrustAdakiteIgneous rockGeochemistryEarth scienceSubductionContinental arcContinental collisionOceanic crustMaficPetrologyPaleontologyTectonics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The origin, way of growth, and compositional transition (from basaltic to andesitic) of continental crust remain enigmatic. To better understand the evolution of the Earth's crust, geoscientists have hypothesized two competing models, one is the widely accepted island‐arc model, the other is the newly proposed collision‐zone model that continental collision produces and preserves syn‐collisional Mantle‐derived Bulk‐continental‐crust‐like Granitoids (MBGs), and hence maintains net continental crust growth. Here, we tested the collision‐zone model by investigating the existence, temporal‐spatial distribution, geochemical signatures, and possible sources of the syn‐collisional MBGs. We applied deep learning (DL) algorithm and principal component analysis (PCA) to the database GEOROC and Tibetan Magmatism Database. DL successfully built a regression model of whole‐rock element compositional data and mean zircon εHf(t) data of igneous rocks. This can not only assign values to the missing Hf data, but statistically unveil the potential relations between the compositions (both isotopic and geochemical) and the possible sources of the igneous rocks. The DL and PCA enabled to recognize the MBGs and define their geochemical and isotopic fingerprints differing noticeably from arc magmas (e.g., Kohistan arc type and Tibetan adakite‐like type). Besides, our observations suggest that MBGs are common in collisional settings as a response to known collision events. Moreover, the MBGs' distinct geochemical and isotopic signatures indicate that they are likely sourced from subducted ocean crust. Our results therefore generally support evident contribution of syn‐collisional felsic magmatism to net continental crust growth. However, further refinement of the petrogenesis and estimation of the (relative) volume are critically needed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Geophysical Research Solid EarthSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207