MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4205227709 · doi:10.1002/glia.24143

The expression and function of glutamate aspartate transporters in Bergmann glia are decreased in neuronal nitric oxide <scp>synthase‐knockout</scp> mice during postnatal development

2022· article· en· W4205227709 on OpenAlexafffund

Bibliographic record

VenueGlia · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Canadian institutionsRobarts Clinical TrialsWestern University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsNitric oxideGlutamate receptorCerebellumNitric oxide synthaseDownregulation and upregulationKnockout mouseBlotImmunohistochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Bergmann glia (BG) predominantly use glutamate/aspartate transporters (GLAST) for glutamate uptake in the cerebellum. Recently, nitric oxide (NO) treatment has been shown to upregulate GLAST function and increase glutamate uptake in vitro. We previously discovered that neuronal nitric oxide synthase knockout (nNOS −/− ) mice displayed structural and functional neuronal abnormalities in the cerebellum during development, in addition to previously reported motor deficits. Although these developmental deficits have been identified in the nNOS −/− cerebellum, it is unknown whether BG morphology and GLAST expression are also affected in the absence of nNOS in vivo. This study is the first to characterize BG morphology and GLAST expression during development in nNOS −/− mice using immunohistochemistry and western blotting across postnatal development. Results showed that BG in nNOS −/− mice exhibited abnormal morphology and decreased GLAST expression compared with wildtype (WT) mice across postnatal development. Treating ex vivo WT cerebellar slices with the NOS inhibitor L‐NAME decreased GLAST expression while treating nNOS −/− slices with the slow‐release NO‐donor NOC‐18 increased GLAST expression when compared with their respective controls. In addition, treating primary BG isolated from WT mice with the selective nNOS inhibitor 7N decreased the membrane expression of GLAST and influx of Ca 2+ /Na + , while treating nNOS −/− BG with SNAP increased the membrane expression of GLAST and Ca 2+ /Na + influx. Moreover, the effects of SNAP on GLAST expression and Ca 2+ /Na + influx in nNOS −/− BG were significantly reduced by a PKG inhibitor. Together, these results reveal a novel role for nNOS/NO signaling in BG development, regulated by a PKG‐mediated mechanism.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.304
Threshold uncertainty score0.659

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGliaSame topicNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchFrench-language works237,207