Voice characteristics from isolated rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder to early Parkinson's disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Speech disorders are amongst the first symptoms to appear in Parkinson's disease (PD). OBJECTIVES: We aimed to characterize PD voice signature from the prodromal stage (isolated rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder, iRBD) to early PD using an automated acoustic analysis and compare male and female patients. We carried out supervised learning classifications to automatically detect patients using voice only. METHODS: Speech samples were acquired in 256 French speakers (117 participants with early PD, 41 with iRBD, and 98 healthy controls), with a professional quality microphone, a computer microphone and their own telephone. High-level features related to prosody, phonation, speech fluency and rhythm abilities were extracted. Group analyses were performed to determine the most discriminant features, as well as the impact of sex, vocal tasks, and microphone type. These speech features were used as inputs of a support vector machine and were combined with classifiers using low-level features. RESULTS: PD related impairments were found in prosody, pause durations and rhythmic abilities, from the prodromal stage. These alterations were more pronounced in men than in women. Early PD detection was achieved with a balanced accuracy of 89% in males and 70% in females. Participants with iRBD were detected with a balanced accuracy of 63% (reaching 70% in the subgroup with mild motor symptoms). CONCLUSION: This study provides new insight in the characterization of sex-dependent early PD speech impairments, and demonstrates the valuable benefit of including automated voice analysis in future diagnostic procedures of prodromal PD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".