Response to Letter to the Editor From Asa and Mete: “Hypophysitis, the Growing Spectrum of a Rare Pituitary Disease”
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dear Editor, We thank Asa and Mete for their interest in our article “Mini-review: Hypophysitis, the Growing Spectrum of a Rare Pituitary Disease” (1), in which we discuss diagnosis and management of hypophysitis (Hy), address common clinical questions, and describe a variety of underlying etiologies and conditions associated with Hy. The authors (2) point to an omission of xanthomatous Hy often associated with rupture of a Rathke cleft cyst. However, we detail that xanthomatous Hy is often linked to rupture of a Rathke cleft cyst or other cystic pituitary masses and could be an important unrecognized clinical problem. This is highlighted in case 2 (1) (a patient with xanthomatous Hy and craniopharyngioma) and in Figure 1 (1). Furthermore, additional literature on this topic is referenced in the article (1). The authors (2) also raise an important fact regarding the evolving nomenclature of Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) and Erdheim-Chester disease (ECD). Recent discovery of activating mutations in proto-oncogene B rapidly accelerated fibrosarcoma (BRAF) V600E and other genes involved in MAPK pathways in many patients with LCH and ECD, have shed new light on these entities, pointing to a neoplastic process and new treatment options for some, but not all, patients. In the article (1), we referenced several recent reports (3-6) that describe these genetic pathways and note available treatments in the text and figures, including use of targeted BRAF and MEK inhibitor therapies (1). Disease pathogenesis of LCH and ECD is characterized by histiocytic infiltration and inflammation in multiple organs (3, 7) and, as such, these disorders were grouped for differential diagnosis and treatment as infiltrative disorders/multisystemic disease. Interestingly, Goyal et al (8) and Gulati et al (3), as cited by the authors (2), although focusing on a new proposed ECD/LCH nomenclature, also describe hypothalamic/pituitary involvement as infiltrative. As highlighted (1), we concur that it is important to raise awareness of the origin of ECD and LCH as both diagnosis and treatment are complex and require specific imaging, tissue biopsy, chemotherapy, targeted therapy (eg, BRAF and MEK inhibitors), glucocorticoids, radiation, or a combination of all. Furthermore, management pathways for ECD and LCH vs those for malignancy with mass effect are different, as shown in Figure 5 (1). As we wrote (1), knowledge of both primary and secondary Hy types and nomenclature of infiltrative and inflammatory conditions have been evolving. We look forward to diagnosis and treatment improvements for patients with these complex disorders. No funding has been received for this work. The authors have no conflict related to this topic.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.019 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.030 | 0.025 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".