MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4205272101 · doi:10.2514/6.2022-1041

Aerodynamic Design and Performance Optimization of Camber Adaptive Winglet for the UAS-S45

2022· article· en· W4205272101 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAIAA SCITECH 2022 Forum · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAeroelasticity and Vibration Control
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWingtip deviceAileronLift-to-drag ratioCamber (aerodynamics)DragClimbAerospace engineeringAerodynamicsLift-induced dragNACA airfoilEngineeringComputer scienceStructural engineeringPhysicsMechanicsTurbulenceReynolds number

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

View Video Presentation: https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2022-1041.vid Winglets are well-known devices that increase aircraft fuel efficiency by allowing for high lift-to-drag ratios and reduced induced drag. Morphing structures can be implemented in specific parts of the aircraft to improve its flight performance and maneuverability. The present study describes the design optimization of a camber adaptive winglet for the UAS-45 wing using the Modified Akima piecewise cubic Hermite interpolation (Makima) parameterization technique. This design technique is simple and effectively controls the winglet geometry in terms of morphing shape flexibility. The Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) algorithm coupled with the Pattern Search is used in this study for optimizing the winglet. By employing the Vortex Lattice Method (VLM) in MATLAB to calculate the aerodynamic properties of the winglet geometry, and a range of airfoil sections can be created and evaluated under various flight conditions to determine the optimal shapes. These optimizations are performed to minimize the drag for climb flight condition and maximize the endurance for cruise flight conditions respectively, and to determine the impact of different constraints on the accuracy of the optimization. The lift-induced drag was reduced for both the climb and cruise flight conditions by using the optimization framework to define the camber section of a winglet. This research discusses the optimization technique and compares winglet geometries, demonstrating that changing the winglet geometry in flight can enhance aircraft performance while lowering drag, therefore the fuel consumption.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.975
Threshold uncertainty score0.325

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it