MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4205274612 · doi:10.1016/j.xcrm.2021.100506

MEK inhibition invigorates chemoimmunotherapy by tumor mitophagy-induced CXCL10 expression

2022· letter· en· W4205274612 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
B. Leticia Rodriguez, Don L. Gibbons

Bibliographic record

VenueCell Reports Medicine · 2022
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Cancer Institute, Cairo UniversityTakeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A.SanofiAstellas Pharma USJanssen PharmaceuticalsAstraZenecaEli Lilly and Company
KeywordsCancer researchChemoimmunotherapyMedicineCancerMEK inhibitorMAPK/ERK pathwayInternal medicineImmunotherapyBiologyKinaseCell biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A recent study by Limagne et al.1Limagne E. Nuttin L. Thibaudin M. Jacquin E. Aucagne R. Bon M. Revy S. Barnestein R. Ballot E. Truntzer C. et al.MEK inhibition overcomes chemoimmunotherapy resistance by inducing CXCL10 in cancer cells.Cancer Cell. 2021; (Published January 13, 2022)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccell.2021.12.009Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF Scopus (2) Google Scholar in Cancer Cell demonstrates that addition of MEK inhibitor to standard-of-care platinum/pemetrexed promotes mitophagy-dependent CXCL10 expression via optineurin and TLR9. Tumor cell secretion of CXCL10 produces T cell recruitment and enhances immunotherapy efficacy. A recent study by Limagne et al.1Limagne E. Nuttin L. Thibaudin M. Jacquin E. Aucagne R. Bon M. Revy S. Barnestein R. Ballot E. Truntzer C. et al.MEK inhibition overcomes chemoimmunotherapy resistance by inducing CXCL10 in cancer cells.Cancer Cell. 2021; (Published January 13, 2022)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccell.2021.12.009Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF Scopus (2) Google Scholar in Cancer Cell demonstrates that addition of MEK inhibitor to standard-of-care platinum/pemetrexed promotes mitophagy-dependent CXCL10 expression via optineurin and TLR9. Tumor cell secretion of CXCL10 produces T cell recruitment and enhances immunotherapy efficacy. In various tumor types, including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the MAPK signaling pathway is frequently mutated at one of multiple points and plays a driver role in tumorigenesis. However, except in combination with RAF inhibitors for BRAF mutant NSCLC, MEK inhibitors have failed to demonstrate clinical activity for oncogene-selected or broader groups of NSCLC as single-agents, or with either chemotherapy or immunotherapy. Front-line treatment options for NSCLC patients include treatment with immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) alone or with a platinum-based doublet chemotherapy (taxane or pemetrexed), depending on histology. Despite high response rates and improved progression-free or overall survival, durable responses indicative of effective immune engagement are observed in less than 50% of patients receiving the ICB combination with platinum/pemextrexed.2Gandhi L. Rodríguez-Abreu D. Gadgeel S. Esteban E. Felip E. De Angelis F. Domine M. Clingan P. Hochmair M.J. Powell S.F. et al.KEYNOTE-189 InvestigatorsPembrolizumab plus Chemotherapy in Metastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.N. Engl. J. Med. 2018; 378: 2078-2092https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1801005Crossref PubMed Scopus (2900) Google Scholar The lack of effective response is most pronounced in patients with low levels of PD-L1 staining, suggesting that patients without significant tumor immune infiltration at baseline are less likely to respond. Identifying combination strategies that may enhance the durable immunologic response will improve clinical outcomes for NSCLC patients. Recent pre-clinical studies have highlighted the potential role of MEK inhibitor combinations that affect the immune cell landscape3Peng D.H. Rodriguez B.L. Diao L. Gaudreau P.O. Padhye A. Konen J.M. Ochieng J.K. Class C.A. Fradette J.J. Gibson L. et al.Th17 cells contribute to combination MEK inhibitor and anti-PD-L1 therapy resistance in KRAS/p53 mutant lung cancers.Nat. Commun. 2021; 12: 2606https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22875-wCrossref Scopus (11) Google Scholar,4Wang Y. Liu S. Yang Z. Algazi A.P. Lomeli S.H. Wang Y. Othus M. Hong A. Wang X. Randolph C.E. et al.Anti-PD-1/L1 lead-in before MAPK inhibitor combination maximizes antitumor immunity and efficacy.Cancer Cell. 2021; 39: 1375-1387.e6https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccell.2021.07.023Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (13) Google Scholar or where tumor MAPK activation drives an immune-evasive tumor microenvironment,5Haas L. Elewaut A. Gerard C.L. Umkehrer C. Leiendecker L. Pedersen M. Krecioch I. Hoffmann D. Novatchkova M. Kuttke M. et al.Acquired resistance to anti-MAPK targeted therapy confers an immune-evasive tumor microenvironment and cross-resistance to immunotherapy in melanoma.Nat. Can. 2021; 2: 693-708https://doi.org/10.1038/s43018-021-00221-9Crossref Scopus (15) Google Scholar indicating a potential role for MEK inhibitors outside of the targeted agent landscape. Using the syngeneic Lewis lung cancer (LLC1) model, Limagne et al.1Limagne E. Nuttin L. Thibaudin M. Jacquin E. Aucagne R. Bon M. Revy S. Barnestein R. Ballot E. Truntzer C. et al.MEK inhibition overcomes chemoimmunotherapy resistance by inducing CXCL10 in cancer cells.Cancer Cell. 2021; (Published January 13, 2022)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccell.2021.12.009Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF Scopus (2) Google Scholar initially investigated the optimal chemotherapy treatment strategy to induce immunological cell death (ICD), aiming to identify combinations that might work best with ICB. Standard chemotherapy platinum-doublet regimens were tested and cisplatin/pemetrexed was found to induce the highest levels of ten validated ICD markers. However, they further observed that the addition of immunotherapy (anti-PD-L1) did not improve the therapeutic outcome of cisplatin/pemetrexed. The authors hypothesized that despite the synergistic stimulation of ICD, the chemo-immunotherapy combination was unable to induce T cell recruitment and that augmentation of the CXCL10 levels may reinvigorate the T cell recruitment and immune response. The authors performed a drug screen with clinically available kinase inhibitors to rationally identify a combination capable of restoring CXCL10 production upon cisplatin/pemetrexed treatment. They observed that three MEK inhibitors (MEKi) and an ERK inhibitor enhanced CXCL10 production in combination with cisplatin/pemetrexed treatment. Utilizing the MEK inhibitor, trametinib, they found that the CXCL10 levels increased in a dose-dependent manner only in combination with cisplatin/pemetrexed and enhanced mouse survival in the LLC1 model in an immune-dependent manner. Addition of the MEK inhibitor enhanced the T cell infiltration, consistent with findings by multiple groups.6Verma V. Jafarzadeh N. Boi S. Kundu S. Jiang Z. Fan Y. Lopez J. Nandre R. Zeng P. Alolaqi F. et al.MEK inhibition reprograms CD8+ T lymphocytes into memory stem cells with potent antitumor effects.Nat. Immunol. 2021; 22: 53-66https://doi.org/10.1038/s41590-020-00818-9Crossref PubMed Scopus (30) Google Scholar,7Ebert P.J.R. Cheung J. Yang Y. McNamara E. Hong R. Moskalenko M. Gould S.E. Maecker H. Irving B.A. Kim J.M. et al.MAP Kinase Inhibition Promotes T Cell and Anti-tumor Activity in Combination with PD-L1 Checkpoint Blockade.Immunity. 2016; 44: 609-621https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2016.01.024Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (413) Google Scholar The addition of the MEK inhibitor to cisplatin/pemetrexed also induced a prominent upregulation of PD-L1. Therefore, the authors investigated the addition of PD-L1 checkpoint blockade to the MEKi/cisplatin/pemetrexed combination in the LLC1 model and observed enhanced survival and improved tumor growth inhibition. They further confirmed the enhanced in vivo effects of MEK inhibition on chemoimmunotherapy across multiple models, including a urethane-induced lung cancer model and both the syngeneic 4T1 breast and the CT26 colorectal cancer models. The authors investigated the mechanism underlying the improved efficacy of MEK inhibitor in the cisplatin/pemetrexed combination and observed that the increased CXCL10 expression was from the tumor cells rather than the CD45 population, suggesting a tumor-intrinsic response specifically due to MEK inhibition. To gain a deeper understanding of the tumor cell changes contributing to the increased CXCL10, the authors performed mRNA sequencing, and differential expression analysis revealed an increase in pathways associated with autophagy/mitophagy processes. Knockout of the essential autophagy related gene 5 (Atg5) decreased CXCL10 induction and eliminated the synergistic effect of MEKi within the cisplatin/pemetrexed combination. Interestingly these results are consistent with recent findings by Kinsey et al.8Kinsey C.G. Camolotto S.A. Boespflug A.M. Guillen K.P. Foth M. Truong A. Schuman S.S. Shea J.E. Seipp M.T. Yap J.T. et al.Protective autophagy elicited by RAF®MEK®ERK inhibition suggests a treatment strategy for RAS-driven cancers.Nat. Med. 2019; 25: 620-627https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-019-0367-9Crossref PubMed Scopus (264) Google Scholar which also found that inhibition of the MEK/ERK signaling pathway elicits autophagy. The authors further found that the selective mitophagy adaptor optineurin was induced by MEK inhibition and was necessary for both CXCL10 production and the antitumor effect of the MEKi/cisplatin/pemetrexed combination. Optineurin appears to be the driver of autophagy, as its knockdown eliminates the ability of MEKi to induce CXCL10. The authors also demonstrate that mitochondrial damage released mitochondrial DNA and activated TLR9 in the LLC1 cells to trigger CXCL10 production. Taking these results together, the authors have shown in the syngeneic LLC1 tumors that the addition of MEKi to cisplatin/pemetrexed drives mitochondrial damage and mitophagy via optineurin, resulting in mitochondrial DNA degradation that is recognized by TLR9 and leads to CXCL10 expression. CXCL10 expression by the tumor cells increases CD8 T cell infiltration into the microenvironment and sensitizes them to checkpoint blockade. The authors explored the translational impact of their preclinical findings by evaluating human lung cancer cell lines and performing retrospective analysis of either soluble plasma factors or mRNA seq from four small, independent cohorts of advanced NSCLC patients treated with immunotherapy alone or platinum-based doublet chemotherapy. Increased CXCL10 expression was observed in human NSCLC cell lines (including A549, H358, and H1975) after exposure to MEKi/cisplatin/pemetrexed as compared to cisplatin/pemetrexed. Patients that had response to first-line platinum-based doublet chemotherapy had higher levels of circulating CXCL10, while higher plasma levels of CXCL10 were found to be associated with better progression-free survival rates upon subsequent anti-PD-1 treatment. In the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and other cohorts, the authors observed a correlation between the activation of the MAPK pathway and the expression of OPTN, TLR9, CXCL10, and the levels of CD8A as a marker of effector T cells. They additionally showed that the combination of OPTN, CXCL10, and TLR9 levels predicts for better progression-free survival with anti-PD-1 treatment. Although their original observations of synergy with MEKi/chemoimmunotherapy treatment were noted across tumor models, one of the study limitations arises from the authors primarily using the LLC1 model for their mechanistic studies outlining the role for mitophagy, which they acknowledge may not entirely recapitulate human cancer biology. Nonetheless, the studies with human cell lines provide additional support for some of the pre-clinical results. Another limitation is that the retrospective translational analyses were performed in advanced NSCLC samples from patients who did not receive MEK inhibitor treatment. These patients were treated with immunotherapy as second-line treatment after progression on initial platinum-based doublet chemotherapy, but were not treated with MEK inhibitors, providing a caveat to the applicability of the results. Clinical trials in which a MEK inhibitor was added to standard-of-care chemotherapy reveal limited efficacy and a high incidence of toxicity.9Melosky B. Bradbury P. Tu D. Florescu M. Reiman A. Nicholas G. Basappa N. Rothenstein J. Goffin J.R. Laurie S.A. et al.Selumetinib in patients receiving standard pemetrexed and platinum-based chemotherapy for advanced or metastatic KRAS wildtype or unknown non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer: A randomized, multicenter, phase II study. Canadian Cancer Trials Group (CCTG) IND.219.Lung Cancer. 2019; 133: 48-55https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2019.04.027Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (15) Google Scholar,10Froesch P. Mark M. Rothschild S.I. Li Q. Godar G. Rusterholz C. Oppliger Leibundgut E. Schmid S. Colombo I. Metaxas Y. et al.Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK)Binimetinib, pemetrexed and cisplatin, followed by maintenance of binimetinib and pemetrexed in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and KRAS mutations. The phase 1B SAKK 19/16 trial.Lung Cancer. 2021; 156: 91-99https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2021.04.002Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (2) Google Scholar As such, addition of MEK inhibitor to standard-of-care chemoimmunotherapy may need to be considered on a temporal sequential basis guided by biomarkers and/or indicators of resistance. Recent pre-clinical work by Wang et al.4Wang Y. Liu S. Yang Z. Algazi A.P. Lomeli S.H. Wang Y. Othus M. Hong A. Wang X. Randolph C.E. et al.Anti-PD-1/L1 lead-in before MAPK inhibitor combination maximizes antitumor immunity and efficacy.Cancer Cell. 2021; 39: 1375-1387.e6https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccell.2021.07.023Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (13) Google Scholar found that initial treatment with immunotherapy followed by MAPK inhibition optimized anti-tumor response and lead to immune cell reinvigoration. Future studies should focus on the dosing of MEKi that is necessary for CXCL10 induction and further assess which biomarkers best indicate the time point and order when immunotherapy should be given versus MEKi. In summary, the study by Laminge et al.1Limagne E. Nuttin L. Thibaudin M. Jacquin E. Aucagne R. Bon M. Revy S. Barnestein R. Ballot E. Truntzer C. et al.MEK inhibition overcomes chemoimmunotherapy resistance by inducing CXCL10 in cancer cells.Cancer Cell. 2021; (Published January 13, 2022)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccell.2021.12.009Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF Scopus (2) Google Scholar has shown that CXCL10 is critical for CD8 T cell recruitment and necessary to restore immune checkpoint blockade efficacy within cisplatin/pemetrexed-treated tumors. The authors demonstrate that addition of MEK inhibitor restored CXCL10 expression, which was accomplished via upregulation of the optineurin and TLR9 axis. This work highlights the need to utilize effective combination approaches that are guided by biomarkers, such as CXCL10, in order to enhance the efficacy of currently available immune checkpoint therapies. A focused effort is needed to determine and define biomarkers of response to MEK inhibitors, chemotherapy/immunotherapy, and the optimal drug dosing strategy that will produce better outcomes for NSCLC patients. D.L.G. has received research funding from AstraZeneca, Astellas, Janssen, Ribon Therapeutics, Takeda, and NGM Biopharmaceuticals; reports advisory role/consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Sanofi, Menarini Ricerche, and Eli Lilly; and research funding to MD Anderson Cancer Center from Boehringer Ingelheim. B.L.R. declares no competing interests. MEK inhibition overcomes chemoimmunotherapy resistance by inducing CXCL10 in cancer cellsLimagne et al.Cancer CellJanuary 19, 2022In BriefLimagne et al. show that simultaneous treatment by chemotherapy and MEK inhibitors promotes mitophagy and mitochondrial DNA recognition by TLR9. TLR9 signaling leads to CXCL10 expression in cancer cells and CD8+ T cell recruitment to tumors and improves efficacy of PD-L1 blockade. Full-Text PDF

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.172
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCell Reports MedicineSame topicCancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersFrench-language works237,207