MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4205306693 · doi:10.1109/twc.2021.3130404

On the Coverage of UAV-Assisted SWIPT Networks With Nonlinear EH Model

2021· article· en· W4205306693 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUAV Applications and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersKey Scientific Research Project of Colleges and Universities in Henan ProvinceNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer scienceNonlinear systemWirelessComputer networkTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) with huge-capacity batteries could be employed to wirelessly charge the ground sensor users (GSUs) and enhance the coverage of aerial wireless networks in outdoor Internet of Things (IoT). This paper investigates the information and energy coverage of UAV-enabled simultaneous wireless information and power transfer (SWIPT) networks. Both power splitting (PS) and time switching (TS) receiver architectures are considered. By using stochastic geometry approach, the general and explicit expressions of the information coverage probability (ICP), the energy coverage probability (ECP) and the joint information and energy coverage probability (JIECP) are derived under the nonlinear and linear energy harvesting (EH) models, respectively. Particularly, the Laplace transform and the probability generating functional (PGFL) are used to derive the ICP. And, Campbell’s theorem and the maximum function are applied to obtain the ECP and the JIECP, respectively. To achieve the optimal UAVs’ deployment density, the maximization optimization problems are formulated for the PS-based and TS-based systems, respectively. By using the series expansion of <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$Q(x)$ </tex-math></inline-formula> ( <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$Q$ </tex-math></inline-formula> -function) with large <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$x$ </tex-math></inline-formula> , the closed-form approximating optimal solutions to the formulated problems are obtained. Monte Carlo simulations validate the correction of our obtained theoretical results, and numerical results show that the performance of the PS-based system is superior to that of the TS-based one. Moreover, when the energy requirement of GSUs or the transmit power of UAVs is relatively large, or when the information requirement of GSUs or the UAV deployment density is relatively small, compared with the nonlinear EH model, the analysis bias caused by traditional linear EH model is relatively large and in these cases, traditional linear EH model cannot be used to replace the nonlinear EH one for the system performance analysis or optimal system design.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.967
Threshold uncertainty score0.529

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it