Systematic identification of genomic elements that regulate<i>FCGR2A</i>expression and harbor variants linked with autoimmune disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: FCGR2A binds antibody-antigen complexes to regulate the abundance of circulating and deposited complexes along with downstream immune and autoimmune responses. Although the abundance of FCRG2A may be critical in immune-mediated diseases, little is known about whether its surface expression is regulated through cis genomic elements and non-coding variants. In the current study, we aimed to characterize the regulation of FCGR2A expression, the impact of genetic variation and its association with autoimmune disease. METHODS: We applied CRISPR-based interference and editing to scrutinize 1.7 Mb of open chromatin surrounding the FCGR2A gene to identify regulatory elements. Relevant transcription factors (TFs) binding to these regions were defined through public databases. Genetic variants affecting regulation were identified using luciferase reporter assays and were verified in a cohort of 1996 genotyped healthy individuals using flow cytometry. RESULTS: We identified a complex proximal region and five distal enhancers regulating FCGR2A. The proximal region split into subregions upstream and downstream of the transcription start site, was enriched in binding of inflammation-regulated TFs, and harbored a variant associated with FCGR2A expression in primary myeloid cells. One distal enhancer region was occupied by CCCTC-binding factor (CTCF) whose binding site was disrupted by a rare genetic variant, altering gene expression. CONCLUSIONS: The FCGR2A gene is regulated by multiple proximal and distal genomic regions, with links to autoimmune disease. These findings may open up novel therapeutic avenues where fine-tuning of FCGR2A levels may constitute a part of treatment strategies for immune-mediated diseases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".