MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4205340917 · doi:10.1016/j.xjtc.2021.12.009

State-of-the-art silicone molded models for simulation of arterial switch operation: Innovation with parting-and-assembly strategy

2022· article· en· W4205340917 on OpenAlex
Brandon Peel, Whal Lee, Nabil Hussein, Shi‐Joon Yoo

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJTCVS Techniques · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAnatomy and Medical Technology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSilicone3d printedMolding (decorative)3D printingThree dimensional printing3d modelBiomedical engineeringMedicineMaterials scienceComputer scienceComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Three-dimensional (3D) printed models are widely accepted for use in training of various surgical procedures for congenital heart disease; however, their physical properties have been considered suboptimum for procedures. We created silicone molded models produced using a novel "parting and assembly" strategy and compared their suitability for hands-on training with that of conventional 3D printed models. Methods: Computed tomography imaging data from 2 patients with transposition of the great arteries were used. The heart was divided into multiple parts (atria, ventricles, great arteries, coronary arteries, and valves), and molds of each part were created. The parts reproduced by silicone molding were assembled using an adhesive agent. In an online course, 2 silicone molded models and 1 3D printed model were used for training of 34 surgeons. A questionnaire was distributed to these surgeons aimed at assessing the suitability of the models for the arterial switch operation (ASO). Results: The silicone molded models showed excellent anatomic detail, high elasticity, and high resistance to tearing. The cost per model, based on the production of 50 models, was slightly higher for the silicone molded models compared with the 3D printed models. All 26 surgeons who completed the questionnaire reported that the silicone molded models provided sufficient anatomic information, but only 19% said the same for the 3D printed models. All surgeons also considered the silicone models to be realistic when passing a needle, cutting vessels, suturing, and excision of the coronary buttons, as opposed to <46% for the 3D printed models. Conclusions: Silicone molding of models for the ASO is feasible by applying a "parting and assembly" strategy. Silicone molded models provide excellent physical properties that are far superior to those of 3D printed models for surgical simulation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.287
Threshold uncertainty score0.256

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it