Magnetic-field-free spin–orbit torque-driven magnetization dynamics in CoFeB/β-W-based nanoelements
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A full numerical analysis, which takes into account the effects of the spin Hall effect, interfacial Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya interaction, and thermal fluctuations, is carried out in in-plane magnetized CoFeB/MgO/CoFeB/high-resistivity tungsten (β-W) nanoelements. The analysis is focused on the investigation of the underlying mechanisms of magnetic-field-free spin–orbit torque (SOT)-driven magnetization reversal process on subnanosecond time scales. It is found that the magnetization in the free magnetic layer can be electrically toggled between the parallel and antiparallel alignment with respect to the fixed magnetic layer without the assistance of an external magnetic field, in which the out-of-plane canting of the magnetic moments at the element edges plays a significant role in the nucleation and subsequent expansion of the reversed magnetization. Furthermore, the thermally activated magnetization process combined with the SOT effect is found to significantly reduce the effective energy barrier to the magnetization reversal and alter the details of the SOT-driven magnetization process in nanomagnets.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".