Making Time and Space for Art: An Examination of an Artist-in-Residence Within a Postsecondary Art Education Program
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract: This article examines the process and impact of an artist-in-residence program in Art Education at the University of Victoria. After an open call to artists, contemporary Upper Tanana visual artist, Teresa Vander Meer-Chassé, member of the White River First Nation of Beaver Creek, Yukon and Alaska was selected as the inaugural artist-in-residence. Through research-creation and qualitative methods this research examines the artist’s artistic process and the impact of an artist-in-residence on students’ and faculty’s perception of artistic practice and their experience working with an artist-in-residence within a post-secondary space of learning. Through photographic documentation, reflections and interviews by participants, the article examines ways the artist-in-residence enriched student and faculty learning in a Faculty of Education. Keywords: Artist-in-residence; Post-secondary education; Artistic inquiry; Indigenous pedagogy; Beading. Résumé : Cet article s’intéresse au processus et à l’impact d’un programme d’artiste en résidence dans le domaine de l’enseignement des arts à l’Université de Victoria. Suite à une audition ouverte d’artistes, l’artiste visuelle contemporaine du Haut Tanana Teresa Vander Meer-Chassé, membre de la Première Nation de White River de Beaver Creek, du Yukon et de l’Alaska, a été choisie artiste-résidente inaugurale. La présente recherche utilise des méthodes quantitatives et de recherche-création pour étudier la démarche artistique de l’artiste et l’impact d’une artiste-résidente sur la perception de la pratique artistique chez les étudiants et le corps enseignant. On y analyse aussi l’impact de collaborer avec une artiste-résidente en milieu d’apprentissage postsecondaire. Documentation photographique, réflexions et entrevues des participant.e.s sont mises à profit pour déterminer de quelles façons l’artiste- résidente a enrichi l’apprentissage étudiant et du corps enseignant au sein de la Faculté d’éducation. Mots-clés : artiste-résidente, enseignement postsecondaire, recherche artistique, pédagogie autochtone, perlage.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.016 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".