GP.6 Improving Triaging of EEG Referrals for Rule out Infantile Spasms (ITERIS)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Infantile spasms (IS) is a devastating pediatric seizure disorder for which EEG referrals are prioritized at the Hospital for Sick Children, representing a resource challenge. The goal of this study was to improve the triaging system for these referrals. Methods: Part 1: descriptive analysis was performed retrospectively on EEG referrals. Part 2: prospective questionnaires were used to determine relative risk of various predictive factors. Part 3: electronic referral form was amended to include 5 positive predictive factors. A triage point system was tested by assigning EEGs as high risk (3 days), standard risk (1 week), or low risk (2 weeks). A machine learning model was developed. Results: Most EEG referrals were from community pediatricians with a low yield of IS diagnoses. Using the 5 predictive factors, the proposed triage system accurately diagnosed all IS within 3 days. No abnormal EEGs were missed in the low-risk category. The machine learning model had over 90% predictive accuracy and will be prospectively tested. Conclusions: Improving EEG triaging for IS may be possible to prioritize higher risk patients. Machine Learning techniques can potentially be applied to help with predictions. We hope that our findings will ultimately improve resource utilization and patient care.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.018 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".