Influence of meldonium on the Quality of Life of patients with Coronary Artery Disease and Concomitant Arterial hypertension During the Recovery Treatment period After percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aim: To evaluate the impact of meldonium on the quality of life of patients with CAD and concomitant AH during the recovery treatment period after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Materials and methods: The study included 66 patients with CAD, stable angina pectoris II-III functional class and concomitant stage II-III AH, who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Patients were divided into 2 groups. The first group – patients who received meldonium at a dose of 750 mg/d for 6 months in addition to basic therapy, the second group – patients who continued basic therapy. Patients’ health related quality of life (HRQoL) was assessed using the Ukrainian versions of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire, SF-36 Health Status Survey and MacNew Heart Disease HRQL questionnaires. Additionally the need for sublingual nitroglycerin, the frequency of angina attacks per day were evaluated and 6-minute walk test was performed according to standard methods. Results: Additional use of meldonium improved patients` HRQoL. It also led to reducing the number of angina attacks from 3,02 to 1,23 in 1 month and up to 0,62 in 6 months. The frequency of nitroglycerin administration during the day in this group also decreased from 2,22 doses to 1,24 doses after 1 month and to 0,62 doses after 6 months. Conclusions: Meldonium improves the HRQoL of patients with CAD and concomitant AH during the recovery treatment period after PCI. Additional use of meldonium helps to reduce the number of angina attacks in patients with CAD and concomitant AH and reduces the number of daily doses of nitroglycerin.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".