MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4205400457 · doi:10.3174/ajnr.a7385

Decreased Craniocervical CSF Flow in Patients with Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus: A Pilot Study

2022· article· en· W4205400457 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicCerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNormal pressure hydrocephalusHydrocephalusCompliance (psychology)Cerebrospinal fluidCerebrospinal fluid pressureCommunicating hydrocephalusSpinal tap

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Normal pressure hydrocephalus is characterized by systolic peaks of raised intracranial pressure, possibly due to a reduced compliance of the spinal CSF spaces. This concept of a reduced spinal CSF buffer function may be reflected by a low cervical CSF outflow from the cranium. The aim of this study was to investigate craniospinal CSF flow rates by phase-contrast MR imaging in patients with normal pressure hydrocephalus. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 42 participants were included in this prospective study, consisting of 3 study groups: 1) 10 patients with normal pressure hydrocephalus (mean age, 74 [SD, 6] years, with proved normal pressure hydrocephalus according to current scientific criteria); 2) eighteen age-matched healthy controls (mean age, 71 [SD, 5] years); and 3) fourteen young healthy controls (mean age, 21 [SD, 2] years, for investigation of age-related effects). Axial phase-contrast MR imaging was performed, and the maximal systolic CSF and total arterial blood flow rates were measured at the level of the upper second cervical vertebra and compared among all study groups (2-sample unpaired t test). RESULTS: The maximal systolic CSF flow rate was significantly decreased in patients with normal pressure hydrocephalus compared with age-matched and young healthy controls (53 [SD, 40] mL/m; 329 [SD, 175] mL/m; 472 [SD, 194] mL/m; each P < .01), whereas there were no significant differences with regard to maximal systolic arterial blood flow (1160 [SD, 404] mL/m; 1470 [SD, 381] mL/m; 1400 [SD, 254] mL/m; each P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: The reduced maximal systolic craniospinal CSF flow rate in patients with normal pressure hydrocephalus may be reflective of a reduced compliance of the spinal CSF spaces and an ineffective spinal CSF buffer function. Systolic craniospinal CSF flow rates are an easily obtainable MR imaging–based measure that may support the diagnosis of normal pressure hydrocephalus.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of NeuroradiologySame topicCerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalusFrench-language works237,207