MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Temporal Evolution of Intrapartum Fetal Heart Rate Features

2021· article· en· W4205422936 on OpenAlexaff
Johann Vargas-Calixto, Yvonne W. Wu, Michael W. Kuzniewicz, Marie‐Coralie Cornet, Heather Forquer, Lawrence Gerstley, Emily Hamilton, Philip Warrick, Robert E. Kearney

Bibliographic record

Venue2021 Computing in Cardiology (CinC) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeonatal and fetal brain pathology
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNational Institutes of HealthEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human DevelopmentBill and Melinda Gates Foundation
KeywordsMedicineFetal heart rateApproximate entropyStandard deviationHypoxic Ischemic EncephalopathyFetal monitoringPsychological interventionEncephalopathyFetusCardiologyHeart rateObstetricsPediatricsInternal medicinePregnancyStatisticsBlood pressureTime series

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Our research goal is to improve the intrapartum identification of tracings associated with severe acidosis at birth and subsequent hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy so that timely interventions could avoid such complications without causing excessive unnecessary interventions in births with normal outcomes. The present study examines the evolution of fetal heart rate (FHR) features over the course of labor. We analyzed FHR signals collected in the last 6 hours before delivery in 21,853 births with normal neonatal outcomes and in 163 that developed hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) from 15 hospitals of Kaiser Permanente Northern California. We divided these six hours into 18 nonoverlapping 20-minute epochs. The power spectral density of each epoch was divided into three bands: low frequency (LF, 30-150 mHz), movement frequency (MF, 150-500 mHz), and high frequency (HF, 500-1000 mHz). We also estimated the LF/(MF+HF) ratio, the mean and standard deviation of the FHR signal, the approximate entropy (ApEn), and the deceleration capacity (DC). In our results, ApEn, the standard deviation, and DC showed a promising ability to detect risk of HIE as early as 120 minutes before birth, which gives enough leading time for timely interventions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.147
Threshold uncertainty score0.654

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2021 Computing in Cardiology (CinC)Same topicNeonatal and fetal brain pathologyFrench-language works237,207