MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4205432842 · doi:10.4315/jfp-21-135

Controlling Listeria monocytogenes Growth and Biofilm Formation Using Flavonoids

2022· article· en· W4205432842 on OpenAlexafffund

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Food Protection · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBacterial biofilms and quorum sensing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersCanada First Research Excellence Fund
KeywordsListeria monocytogenesBiofilmBacteriaListeria

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT: The aim of this study was to investigate the ability of natural plant-derivate products (flavonoid compounds) to inhibit the growth and biofilm-forming ability of Listeria monocytogenes. A collection of 500 synthetic and natural flavonoids were tested individually on strains of L. monocytogenes for their antimicrobial and antibiofilm activity. The flavonoids were tested against a L. monocytogenes cocktail of five strains at a concentration of 100 μM to determine their effect on planktonic growth. The optical density was measured every hour for 24 h at 37°C, and every hour for 48 h at 22°C. A total of 17 flavonoids were chosen for further study because of their ability to significantly reduce the growth of L. monocytogenes up to 97%. An additional two flavonoids that increased planktonic growth were chosen as well to investigate whether they had the same effect on biofilm growth. A lower concentration of flavonoid compounds (50 μM) was selected to investigate the individual effects on L. monocytogenes biofilm formation using (i) stainless steel coupons to quantify biomass using crystal violet staining and (ii) glass slides using confocal laser scanning microscopic (CLSM) imaging to observe the biofilm architecture. The 19 flavonoids showed various levels of L. monocytogenes biofilm growth inhibition, ranging from 2 to 100% after 48 h of incubation at 22 or 10°C. This includes 18 of the 19 flavonoids significantly (P ≤ 0.05) inhibiting L. monocytogenes biofilm formation on stainless steel coupons under at least one of the testing conditions. However, only one flavonoid compound demonstrated significant biofilm inhibition (P ≤ 0.05) under all conditions tested. Furthermore, 8 of the selected 19 flavonoid compounds showed visible reductions through CLSM in L. monocytogenes biofilm formation. Overall, we identified five flavonoid compounds to be promising antibiofilm and antimicrobial agents against L. monocytogenes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.290

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Food ProtectionSame topicBacterial biofilms and quorum sensingFrench-language works237,207