MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4205466565 · doi:10.3410/f.717957715.793462110

Faculty Opinions recommendation of A multiply redundant genetic switch 'locks in' the transcriptional signature of regulatory T cells.

2012· dataset· en· W4205466565 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Michael A. Farrar

Bibliographic record

VenueFaculty Opinions – Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature · 2012
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTranscription factorFOXP3Political scienceGeneticsBiologyGeneImmune system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The transcription factor Foxp3 participates dominantly in the specification and function of Foxp3(+)CD4(+) regulatory T cells (T(reg) cells) but is neither strictly necessary nor sufficient to determine the characteristic T(reg) cell signature. Here we used computational network inference and experimental testing to assess the contribution of other transcription factors to this. Enforced expression of Helios or Xbp1 elicited distinct signatures, but Eos, IRF4, Satb1, Lef1 and GATA-1 elicited exactly the same outcome, acting in synergy with Foxp3 to activate expression of most of the T(reg) cell signature, including key transcription factors, and enhancing occupancy by Foxp3 at its genomic targets. Conversely, the T(reg) cell signature was robust after inactivation of any single cofactor. A redundant genetic switch thus 'locked in' the T(reg) cell phenotype, a model that would account for several aspects of T(reg) cell physiology, differentiation and stability. PMID: 22961053 Funding information This work was supported by: NIAID NIH HHS, United States Grant ID: R24 AI072073 NIAID NIH HHS, United States Grant ID: R01 AI051530 NIDDK NIH HHS, United States Grant ID: T32 DK7260 Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Canada NIAID NIH HHS, United States Grant ID: 3R24AI072073-03S1 NIGMS NIH HHS, United States Grant ID: T32 GM007753 NIAID NIH HHS, United States Grant ID: R37 AI051530 NIAID NIH HHS, United States Grant ID: AI072073 NIAID NIH HHS, United States Grant ID: AI051530 More Less keyboard_arrow_down

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.402
Threshold uncertainty score0.853

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.4020.171

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFaculty Opinions – Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical LiteratureSame topicSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomicsFrench-language works237,207