MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4205507355 · doi:10.1017/s0022050704002694

Editors' Notes

2004· article· en· W4205507355 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
Knick Harley, Gavin Wright

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Economic History · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicHistorical Economic and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of California, IrvineBinghamton UniversityUniversity of California, Los AngelesUniversity of California, Santa BarbaraUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignUniversidad Carlos III de MadridUniversity of PittsburghUniversity of New South WalesTel Aviv UniversityUniversiteit van AmsterdamUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of TorontoLoughborough UniversityUniversity of OxfordUniversity of LeicesterBowdoin CollegeFranklin and Marshall CollegeLondon School of Economics and Political ScienceSwarthmore CollegeSanta Clara UniversityUniversity of California, DavisUniversity of AkronDartmouth CollegeQueen's UniversityHarvard UniversityUniversity of DelhiBrandeis UniversityTexas Christian UniversityBarnard CollegeUniversity of CambridgeMcGill UniversityGeorge Mason UniversityYork UniversityUniversiteit LeidenUniversity of CanterburyLondon Metropolitan UniversityUniversity of ConnecticutUniversität HohenheimUniversity of MinnesotaUniversitat Pompeu FabraNorthwestern UniversityUniversity of MissouriPrinceton UniversityLehigh UniversityCarleton CollegeMassachusetts Institute of TechnologyVrije Universiteit BrusselHebrew University of JerusalemLunds UniversitetNorth Dakota State UniversityNational University of SingaporeOhio State UniversityUniversity of EssexUniversity of Southern CaliforniaKeio UniversityBoston College
KeywordsWrightTripod (photography)State (computer science)HistoryLibrary scienceComputer scienceArt historyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Journal of Economic History completed another successful year in 2002/03, marked (for a change) by an absence of dramatic change. Most contributors and some book publishers have by now adapted to our tripod office system: North American materials go to Wright at Stanford, all other geographic areas go to Harley at Western Ontario, with Susan Isaac handling production editing tasks at Florida State. If your paper or book does not fit neatly into this classification system, you can send it wherever you want, but we reserve the right to reallocate afterwards.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.606
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Economic HistorySame topicHistorical Economic and Social StudiesFrench-language works237,207