Incidence, Demographic, and Seasonal Risk Factors of Infections Caused by Five Major Enteric Pathogens, Ontario, Canada, 2010–2017
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In Canada, enteric infections cause significant health and economic burden. We evaluated the individual characteristics of laboratory-confirmed cases of Campylobacter spp. (n = 28,728), non-typhoidal Salmonella spp. (n = 22,640), Yersinia spp. (n = 1674), Verotoxin-producing Escherichia coli (VTEC; n = 1340), and Listeria monocytogenes (n = 471), reported between 2010 and 2017 inclusive, in Ontario, Canada (population ∼13,500,000). We calculated overall and pathogen-specific annual and mean incidence rates (IRs) for Ontario. We used multivariable Poisson and negative binomial regression models to estimate incidence rate ratios (IRRs) for years, seasons, age groups, and sexes, and we included two-way age and sex interaction terms in the models. Campylobacter and Salmonella infections had the highest IRs whereas Listeria infections had the lowest IRs. None of the infections showed long-term trends over the 8-year study period; however, rates of all five infections were elevated in the summer. More Salmonella, VTEC, and Listeria infections were linked to disease outbreaks than were Campylobacter and Yersinia infections. Overall, mean IRs of Campylobacter, Salmonella, Yersinia, and VTEC infections were highest in children 0–4 years old, whereas Listeria IRs peaked in adults 60 years and older. Higher mean IRs of Campylobacter were observed in males. No other differences by sex were statistically significant. The same mean rate was observed in both sexes for Listeria. Adjusting for all other factors, significant age- and sex-specific differences in IRs were observed in Campylobacter, Salmonella, and VTEC infection rates. No significant interactions of age and sex were found for Yersinia and Listeria infections. Future research should focus on the pathogen-specific socioeconomic, environmental, or agricultural risk factors that might be responsible for these infections.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".