P.005 Ovarian resection in anti-NMDAr encephalitis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor encephalitis (NMDArE) is commonly associated with ovarian teratomas, surgical resection of which can lead to significant neurologic improvement. However, the necessity of aggressive resection at the time of diagnosis is unknown; specifically, whether unilateral or bilateral oophorectomy, versus lesionectomy and partial oophorectomy (ovariotomy), is required. Methods: Eleven patients with NMDArE who underwent ovarian resection between January 1 st 2012 and December 31 st 2020 were retrospectively identified. Primary outcome was good one-year functional status, defined as modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-1. Results: Median age at encephalitis onset was 24 years (19–38); median delay from symptom onset to surgery was 39 days (16–129). Six patients (54.5%) had good mRS scores, unrelated to surgical resection type. Conclusions: Added clinical benefit of aggressive ovarian resection techniques at one-year follow-up was not identified in our data. Further longitudinal studies are needed to determine the indications for different surgical techniques in patients with NMDArE. Ovarian resection approaches and associated functional outcomes in patients with NMDArE
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".