[11C]PiB and [18F]AV45 PET radiotracers show different rates of amyloid‐β clearance
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Results from the first Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network Trials Unit (DIAN‐TU) clinical trial showed Gantenerumab reduces amyloid‐β deposition in autosomal dominant Alzheimer disease individuals. However, it is uncertain whether these initial findings from [11C]PiB PET generalize to other amyloid‐β PET radiotracers. Method We acquired [11C]PiB and [18F]AV45 PET in mutation positive DIAN‐TU participants in the gantenerumab (n=30) and placebo drug arms (n=19). Participants were assessed at baseline and Year 4; at each visit, [11C]PiB and [18F]AV45 PET were acquired, with at most 28 days between imaging sessions. Regional standardized uptake value ratios (SUVRs) were quantified using the PET Unified Pipeline. Annualized SUVR percent change between baseline and Year 4 for both radiotracers in both drug arms were calculated. Differences in SUVR change between radiotracers/drug arms were assessed using the Wilcoxon signed‐rank/rank‐sum test. Each test statistic is reported as a rank‐biserial correlation r accompanied by p‐values adjusted for false discovery control by the Benjamini‐Hochberg procedure at level q=0.20. Result We observed a decrease from baseline to Year 4 SUVR in the gantenerumab arm, which was larger when studied with [11C]PiB than with [18F]AV45 PET in several regions, including the striatum and cingulate gyrus (r=[‐0.79,‐0.31], FDR‐adjusted p‐values=[0.00086,0.19], Figure 1). In contrast, we observed an increase in SUVR in the placebo arm, comparable in magnitude between [11C]PiB and [18F]AV45 PET (r=[‐0.15,0.68], FDR‐adjusted p‐values=[0.29,0.86]). Conclusion Differences seen between the effects of gantenerumab in [11C]PiB versus [18F]AV45 PET suggest several regions, such as the striatum and cingulate gyrus, may be inappropriate for radiotracer harmonization in studies involving gantenerumab. More practically, the finding that anti‐amyloid‐β therapies may have different effects on signal across radiotracers suggests multi‐site studies of anti‐amyloid‐β treatments should agree on a single radiotracer for best results. Follow‐up postmortem studies will be conducted to determine the binding affinity of various amyloid‐β radiotracers to amyloid‐β plaques in this cohort.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".