Bibliographic record
Abstract
M. Finkelberg. Homer Iliad Book VI. Edited by B. Graziosi and J. Haubold R. Bees. G. Roskam; On the Path to Virtue. The Stoic doctrine of moral progress and its reception in (middle-)Platonism V. Lorusso: Soranos von Ephesos, Περὶ ψυχῆς. Sammlung der Testimonien, Kommentar und Einleitung von P. Podolak unter der Mitarbeit von J. E. Heßler A. Smith: Giamblico, I Frammenti dale Epistole. Introduzione, testo, traduzione e commento a cura di D. P. Taormina e R. M. Piccione J. Osgood: A. Coşkun, Cicero und das römische Bürgerrecht. Die Verteidigung des Dichters Archias. Einleitung, Text, Übersetzung und historisch-philologische Kommentierungen J. F. Miller: E. Fantham, Latin Poets and Italian Gods S. McGill: Decimi Magni Ausonii Opera omnia. Tomus II. Opera Trevirensia. Edidit atque transtulit commentrioque instruxit P. Dräger L. Burckhardt, M. Tamiolaki, Liberté et esclavage chez les historiens grecs classiques J. P. Stronk: Thomas Harrison, Writing Ancient Persia M. Whitby: K. Mosig-Walburg, Römer und Perser W. Schmitz: K. Matijeviç, Römische und frühchristliche Zeugnisse im Norden Obergermaniens M. T. Griffin: H. Brandt, Am Ende des Lebens. Alter, Tod und Suizid in der Antike J. Heiden: H. Froning, N. Zimmermann-Elseify, Die Terrakotten der antiken Stadt Elis M. Moltesen: R. Bol, Funde aus Milet. Teil 2: Marmorskulpturen der römischen Kaiserzeit aus Milet. Aufstellungskontext und programmatische Aussage. Unter Mitarbeit von S. Frede und P. Schollmeyer. Mit Beiträgen von A. Ahle, U. Bolender, G. Breitner, F. Fless, W. Günther, H. Heres, N. Meissner, S. F. Meynersen, C. Schneider und B. F. Weber (†) Wolfram Martini: Konrad Schauenburg † Personalien
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.030 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".