MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4205628987 · doi:10.1109/tpwrs.2022.3142110

A Data-Driven Method for Prediction of Post-Fault Voltage Stability in Hybrid AC/DC Microgrids

2022· article· en· W4205628987 on OpenAlexaff
Younes Seyedi, Houshang Karimi, Jean Mahseredjian

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Power Systems · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrogrid Control and Optimization
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrogridBenchmark (surveying)Control theory (sociology)Fault (geology)Transient (computer programming)VoltageComputer scienceProbabilistic logicDistributed generationEngineeringControl (management)Artificial intelligenceRenewable energyElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Faults are extreme events that canadversely affect the voltages in islanded microgrids. This paper provides a new data-driven methodology for timely prediction of the post-fault voltage stability in hybrid AC/DC microgrids. The proposed method performs a binary classification with delay constraints by processing sequences of the short-time mean squared deviations using a deep learning system. The deep learning system consists of a bidirectional long short-term memory network whose output is a probabilistic voltage instability indicator. When the value of the indicator is non-zero, persistent voltage disturbances are most likely to occur even after the fault clearance. The proposed method enables the microgrid to carry out remedial or preventive actions, such as event-triggered protection and control of distributed energy resources (DERs), which are advantageous to the resilient operation of the microgrids. Extensive and detailed electromagnetic transient (EMT) simulations of a low-voltage hybrid AC/DC microgrid benchmark are analyzed, and the results confirm the effectiveness of the proposed method for online prediction and fast voltage regulation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Power SystemsSame topicMicrogrid Control and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207