MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4205684947 · doi:10.3389/fneur.2021.730940

Prognosis and Predictors of Symptomatic Intracranial Hemorrhage After Endovascular Treatment of Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke

2022· article· en· W4205684947 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Huixin Shen, Qingfeng Ma, Liqun Jiao, Fei Chen, Sufang Xue, Jingya Li, Zhengping Li, Haiqing Song, Xiaoqin Huang

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Neurology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of China
KeywordsMedicineEndovascular treatmentStroke (engine)OcclusionCardiologyInternal medicineRadiologyAneurysm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) is a devastating complication of endovascular treatment (EVT) in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and is associated with high risk of disability and mortality. This study intended to evaluate the predictors of sICH after EVT in patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO)-induced AIS. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review on consecutive AIS patients who underwent EVT in our University hospital between January 2019 and August 2020. The patients were classified into two groups based upon the occurrence of sICH. The main outcomes were the occurrence of sICH using the Heidelberg Bleeding Classification and functional condition at 90 days. Multivariate logistic regression analysis and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves were used to identify independent predictors of sICH after EVT. RESULTS: < 0.001), with the overall mortality being 112 (30.4%) at 90 days post- EVT. Results from univariate analysis showed significant differences between the two groups in the prevalence of diabetes, initial Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) score, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score after operation, the levels of fasting blood glucose (FBG), neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelets (PLT), and thrombin time (TT) at admission. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that FBG ≥ 7.54 mmol/L (OR: 2.765; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.513-5.054), NLR ≥ 5.48 (OR: 2.711; 95% CI: 1.433-5.128), TT at admission ≥ 16.25 s (OR: 2.022; 95% CI: 1.115-3.667), and NIHSS score within 24 h after the operation ≥ 10 (OR: 3.728; 95% CI: 1.516-9.170) were independent predictors of sICH. The combination of NLR ≥ 5.48, FBG ≥ 7.54 mmol/L, TT at admission ≥ 16.25 s, and NIHSS score within 24 h after the operation ≥ 10 generated an optimal prediction model (AUC: 0.723). CONCLUSION: Higher levels of FDG, NLR, TT at admission, and NIHSS score after operation were associated with sICH after EVT in patients with LVO-induced AIS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in NeurologySame topicAcute Ischemic Stroke ManagementFrench-language works237,207