Elucidating Two Distinct Pathways for Electrocatalytic Hydrogen Production Using Co<sup>II</sup> Pincer Complexes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Hydrogen gas is a sustainable energy source with water as the sole combustion product. As a result, efforts to catalyze H 2 production are pertinent and widespread. The electrocatalytic H 2 generating capabilities of two Co II complexes, [Co(κ 3 ‐2,6‐{Ph 2 PNR} 2 (NC 5 H 3 ))Br 2 ] with R=H ( I ) or R=Me ( II ), were presented for a variety of proton sources including trifluoroacetic acid (TFA), acetic acid (AA), and trifluoroethanol (TFE). Cyclic voltammetry and controlled potential coulometry demonstrated that electrocatalysis from I and II occurred at two different potentials and are associated with different reduction processes. Density functional theory analysis provided insight into the identities of the catalyst and supported two distinct reaction pathways for electrocatalytic proton reduction. Specifically, stronger acids (e. g., AA, TFA) proceeded at −1.31 to −1.45 V through a M I /M III pathway while sources with higher p K a values (e. g., TFE, H 2 O) generated hydrogen at −2.4 V via M 0 /M II ligand‐assisted metal‐centered reduction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".