Pyrrole as an Important Scaffold of Anticancer Drugs: Recent Advances
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With the significant increase of patients suffering from different types of cancer, it is evident that prompt measures in the development of novel and effective agents need to be taken. Pyrrole moiety has been found in various active compounds with anti-inflammatory, antiseptic, antibacterial, lipid-lowering and anticancer properties. Recent advances in the exploration of highly active and selective cytotoxic structures containing pyrrole motifs have shown promising data for future investigations. Accordingly, this review presents an overview of recent developments in the pyrrole derivatives as anticancer agents, with a main focus towards the key moieties required for the anti-tumor activities. Pyrrole molecules comprising prominent targeting capacities against microtubule polymerization, tyrosine kinases, cytochrome p450 family 1, histone deacetylase and bcl-2 proteins were reported. In addition, several mechanisms of action, such as apoptosis, cell cycle arrest, inhibiting kinases, angiogenesis, disruption of cell migration, modulation of nuclear receptor responsiveness and others were analyzed. Furthermore, in most of the discussed cases we provided synthesis schemes of the mentioned molecules. Overall, the utilization of pyrrole scaffold for the design and synthesis of novel anticancer drugs could be a promising approach for future investigations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.046 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it