MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4205774280 · doi:10.52056/9788833138732/03

“Destroying Generation after Generationâ€: Outbreaks of Smallpox in the Cuchumatán Highlands of Guatemala (1780-1810)

2021· article· en· W4205774280 on OpenAlexaff
W. George Lovell

Bibliographic record

VenueStoricamente · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMigration, Education, Indigenous Social Dynamics
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSmallpoxIndigenousPandemicHistoryOutbreakCONQUESTMayaScrutinyCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)DemographyEthnologyAncient historyGeographyEconomic historyPolitical scienceMedicineLawVirologyVaccinationArchaeologySociologyDiseaseInfectious disease (medical specialty)Biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The advent of Covid-19, unforeseen though it was, and destructive though it remains, affords timely opportunity to reflect on the occurrence of past pandemics and their impact on humankind. Devastating as the Black Death in fourteenth-century Europe is known to be, loss-of-life caused too, in the wake of World War I, by the Spanish Flu, both pandemics pale when compared to the mortality of Native Americans following the Columbus landfall. Guatemala and its Indigenous Maya peoples, especially those of the Sierra de los Cuchumatanes, are discussed as a case in point. Demographic collapse here, begun in the 1520s, continued well into the seventeenth century, after which attrition abated and recovery set in – slowly, and not without reversals, as scrutiny of the ravages wrought by the re-occurrence of smallpox between 1780 and 1810 vividly attests. As with the success of vaccines made to combat the scourge of Covid-19, so also did Edward Jenner’s experiments with inoculation prove beneficial, even when they reached and were administered in one of Guatemala’s most isolated and intractable parts. Thereafter, Indigenous numbers stabilized and began to grow, guaranteeing Maya survival.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.211
Threshold uncertainty score0.419

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStoricamenteSame topicMigration, Education, Indigenous Social DynamicsFrench-language works237,207