High-frequency oscillations in scalp EEG: A systematic review of methodological choices and clinical findings
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Pathological high-frequency oscillations (HFOs) in intracranial EEG are promising biomarkers of epileptogenic tissue, and their physiological counterparts play a role in sensorimotor and cognitive function. HFOs have also been found in scalp EEG, but an overview of all studies is lacking. In this systematic review, we assessed the methodology to detect scalp HFOs and their clinical potential. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library for studies on HFOs in scalp EEG, and extracted methodological and clinical data. RESULTS: We included 60 studies with data from 1149 unique individuals. Two-thirds of studies analyzed HFOs visually in the time or time-frequency domain, and one-third automatically with visual validation. Most studies evaluated interictal ripples during sleep in children. Pathological HFOs were overall better than spikes in localizing the epileptogenic zone and predicting outcome, correlated negatively with cognition and positively with disease activity and severity, and decreased after medical and surgical treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The methodologies of the 60 studies were heterogeneous, but pathological scalp HFOs were clinically valuable as biomarkers in various situations, particularly in children with epilepsy. SIGNIFICANCE: This systematic review gives an extensive overview of methodological and clinical data on scalp HFOs, establishing their clinical potential and discussing their limitations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.041 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.010 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".