De enjeitado a ouvidor: a trajetória do Tenente Joaquim Lino Rangel na Freguesia da Cidade do Natal, 1760?-1839
Bibliographic record
Abstract
It is well-known that the abandonment of newborn babies is an existing phenomenon in the western society since antiquity, as such, being justified differently in different places and times. Therefore, the aim of this article is to present the trajectory of Lieutenant Joaquim Lino Rangel, someone who was a foundling in the Parish of the city of Natal in the second half of the XVIII century, but also became a prominent member in the ecclesiastical jurisdiction in the first half of the XIX century . To carry that out, it was analysed parish, council, administrative, archival documents, among others. The procedures taken to deal with the sources were: quantitative, which turned it possible to list the index of rejection and illegitimacy, as well as, qualitative, based on reading, selection and transcription of relevant documents to examine the past reality. Every source was interpreted in the light of Social History, enabling to understand the family plot there was behind that rejection of Joaquim, the consolidation of the social insertion of that individual, who went through a marital quality, through the constitution of a legitimate Family, through the insertion in the local government, thus reaching the status of the ombudsman of Rio Grande do Norte, position which had an immense administrative relevance. Lastly, it was brought to the research order, several groups from Iberian America used the practice of rejection as an strategy to maintain the honor.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".