MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4205794962 · doi:10.1002/alz.050872

Intellectual curiosity and action initiation are subtypes of apathy affected in Huntington’s disease gene expansion carriers

2021· article· en· W4205794962 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Rebecca K. Hendel, Marie N.N. Hellem, Lena E. Hjermind, Jørgen E. Nielsen, Asmus Vogel

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicGenetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsApathyHuntington's diseasePsychologyDiseaseClinical psychologyPsychiatryRating scaleCognitionMedicineInternal medicineDevelopmental psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Apathy is a prevalent behavioral symptom in neurodegenerative diseases. In Huntington’s Disease, apathy can result in severe loss of function for the patient and substantial caregiver distress. The research‐based evidence of apathy is characterized by a lack of generalizability due to methodological differences. In this study we wished to characterize apathy in premanifest and motor‐manifest Huntington’s Disease gene expansion carriers and controls. Method 82 Huntington’s Disease gene expansion carriers (premanifest and motor‐manifest) and 32 controls were included in the study (Mini‐Mental State Examination score ≥ 24 and Montreal Cognitive Assessment score ≥ 19). Apathy was quantified using the Lille Apathy Rating Scale and the Short Problem Behaviors Assessment for Huntington’s Disease. Analyses of association were performed between apathy on the Lille Apathy Rating Scale and motor function, cytosine‐adenine‐guanine repeat length, cytosine‐adenine‐guanine age product score, neuropsychiatric and cognitive screening tests. Result Compared to premanifest and control participants, the motor‐manifest Huntington’s Disease gene expansion carriers scored significantly higher on the global score on the Lille Apathy Rating Scale and on two subscales (Intellectual Curiosity and Action Initiation – see table 1). Likewise, motor‐manifest HD gene expansion carriers scored significantly higher on the Short Problem Behaviors Assessment for Huntington’s Disease. Significant correlations were found between apathy on the Lille Apathy Rating Scale and the motor score, the neuropsychiatric measures and the cognitive screening tests. Apathy was present in 22 % of the Huntington’s Disease gene expansion carriers (including four premanifest participants) when examined with the Lille Apathy Rating Scale. The apathetic participants had significantly higher motor score and were significantly affected on the neuropsychiatric measures and the cognitive screening tests. When entered a multiple stepwise regression model, apathy was predicted by the motor score and the depression score. No other variables could significantly predict apathy on the Lille Apathy Rating Scale. Conclusion Apathy is a frequent and early symptom of disease in Huntington’s Disease gene expansion carriers, and it has a specific expression that might be related to the underlying neuropathology. Apathy is related to disease progression, cognitive decline and neuropsychiatric symptoms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicGenetic Neurodegenerative Diseases→French-language works237,207→