MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4205800978 · doi:10.22215/etd/2021-14681

Deviancy, Sexuality and the Psy-Disciplines at the University of Toronto

2021· dissertation· en· W4205800978 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Matthew Edwards

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsCarleton UniversityUniversity of Toronto
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
KeywordsLegitimationHuman sexualityDisciplineSociologyResistance (ecology)AccreditationGender studiesHomosexualityCriminologyPolitical scienceSocial scienceLawPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

University pedagogy enabled theorization about sexual deviancy to pass as selfevident knowledge in postwar Canada.By integrating psychological, psychiatric and psychoanalytical textbooks into several programs after the Second World War, the University of Toronto became a unique source of local accreditation for these disciplines' professed knowledge about homosexuality.Clinical education at the university's medical school similarly modelled racist and ableist intake procedures ostensibly evaluating specific homosexuals' capacity to benefit from psychoanalysis.This, coupled with the extensive circulation of psy-disciplinary discourse among students, demonstrates the University of Toronto's local influence as a site of legitimation for medicalized, 'rehabilitative' authority over marginalized communities.This approach would consistently be considered progressive and effective by university-educated, middle-class Canadians throughout the 1940s-1970s.The extensive embrace of 'rehabilitative' ideals in postwar Canada would impact both state violence and the resistance strategies of activist organizations like the University of Toronto Homophile Association. Introduction: Sex, Deviancy and the Academy in Postwar TorontoTo date, we have completed treatment on twelve cases, with the youngest subject being a 15-year-old male prostitute from a correctional institution.All had Kinsey ratings of at least '4'.The technician is a first-year graduate student who has no special skills in operant conditioning but who does have a high degree of interest in this field.1 -James Chapel, 1970.________________________________________________________________________ By 1970, a Canadian graduate student with a "high degree of interest" in aversive conditioning could administer shock stimuli from a 7 ½ volt battery to a 15-year-old in the interest of altering their sexuality.The fact that this was not an exceptional state of affairs -that James Chapel felt secure in arguing that the technician's interest outweighed their lack of specific skill, that Chapel's department had unquestioned license to conduct these therapies on institutionalized youth in the first place-indicates the success of a transnational, scholarly campaign to establish the benevolence, rigour and utility of psychiatric knowledge about homosexuality. 2 The presentation of this paper to the 1 James Chapel, "Behaviour Modification Techniques in Children and Adolescents," Canadian Psychiatric Association Journal 15, no. 3 (1970): 317. 2 This campaign was not particular to Canada and is best described as a transnational phenomenon as it pervaded several countries in the postwar period and manifested in myriad forms within them.While an investigation of how Canadian universities were components of global scholarly networks would be extremely historically pertinent, I have not been well-positioned to conduct this (necessarily archival) research in the context of the pandemic.What claims I do make about how professional and academic circles functioned transnationally at this time are largely derived from the approach of Tamson Pietsch, "Many Rhodes: travelling scholarships and imperial citizenship in the British academic world, 1880-1940," History of Education 40, no.6 (2011): 736-738, as well as global histories of sexual research like Chiara Beccalossi, "Optimizing and Normalizing the Population Through Hormone Therapies in Italian Science, c.1926-1950,"The British Journal for the History of Science 53, no.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.980
Threshold uncertainty score0.626

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0200.010
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCanadian Identity and History→French-language works237,207→