Sex-Specific Effect of Blood Oxygen-Carrying Capacity on Orthostatic Tolerance in Older Individuals
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Blood oxygen (O2)-carrying capacity is reduced with aging and has been previously linked with the capacity to withstand the upright posture, that is, orthostatic tolerance (OT). This study experimentally tested the hypothesis that a definite reduction in blood O2-carrying capacity via hemoglobin manipulation differently affects the OT of older women and men as assessed by lower body negative pressure (LBNP). Secondary hemodynamic parameters were determined with transthoracic echocardiography throughout incremental LBNP levels for 1 hour or until presyncope in healthy older women and men (total n = 26) matched by age (64 ± 7 vs 65 ± 8 years, p < .618) and physical activity levels. Measurements were repeated within a week period after a 10% reduction of blood O2-carrying capacity via carbon monoxide rebreathing and analyzed via 2-way analysis of covariance. In the assessment session, OT time was similar between women and men (53.5 ± 6.1 vs 56.4 ± 6.0 minutes, p = .238). Following a 10% reduction of blood O2-carrying capacity, OT time was reduced in women compared with men (51.3 ± 7.0 vs 58.2 ± 2.8 minutes, p = .003). The effect of reduced O2-carrying capacity on OT time differed between sexes (mean difference [MD] = -5.30 minutes, p = .010). Prior to presyncope, reduced O2-carrying capacity resulted in lower left ventricular end-diastolic volume (MD = -8.11 mL∙m-2, p = .043) and stroke volume (MD = -8.04 mL∙m-2, 95% confidence interval = -14.36, -1.71, p = .018) in women relative to men, even after adjusting for baseline variables. In conclusion, present results suggest that reduced blood O2-carrying capacity specifically impairs OT and its circulatory determinants in older women.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".