Surgical Treatment of the Intraspinal Rib Head Dislocation in Children With Dystrophic Scoliosis Secondary to Type 1 Neurofibromatosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to explore the surgical treatment of intraspinal rib head dislocation (IRH) in children with dystrophic scoliosis secondary to type 1 neurofibromatosis (NF1-DS). METHODS: From 2006 to 2019, 32 of 128 patients with NF1-DS were found to have IRH and enrolled in this study. There were 19 boys and 13 girls with an average age of 8.8±2.6 years. Patients were divided into 2 groups: group A (n=25) without IRH resection and group B (n=7) with IRH resection. The intraspinal rib proportion (IRP), apical vertebra rotation, apical vertebral translation, main thoracic curve Cobb angle, trunk shift and thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, and sagittal vertebral axis were measured before and after the operation. Spinal injury was graded based on the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale. RESULTS: The study group had a total of 42 IRH. The mean follow-up duration was 46.1±28.7 months. The preoperative IRP in both groups was similar (35.5±14.3% vs. 31.2±15.3%, P=0.522). The postoperative IRP was lower in group B (18.5±11.2% vs. 0%, P=0.002). The IRP in group A decreased from preoperative (31.2±15.3%) to postoperative (18.5±11.2%) (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the apical vertebra rotation, apical vertebral translation, main thoracic curve Cobb angle, trunk shift, thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, and sagittal vertebral axis between the 2 groups before surgery and after surgery. Four patients with nerve injury caused by the IRH had full neurological recovery postoperatively. All patients were ASIA grade E at the last follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The surgical treatment of IRH in children with NF1-DS should be determined on the basis of the presence of preoperative neurological symptoms. This study supports the practice of correcting spinal deformities only in patients with mild or no spinal cord injury. If there are obvious neurological symptoms, IRH resection is necessary to relieve spinal cord compression to recover nerve function. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".