MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4205851036 · doi:10.31718/2077-1096.21.4.68

CLINICAL AND LABORATORY PREDICTORS OF PAIN SYNDROME PERSISTENCE IN ELDERLY AND SENILE PATIENTS DURING LATE POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD

2021· article· en· W4205851036 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Владислав Олегович Телегань

Bibliographic record

VenueАктуальні проблеми сучасної медицини Вісник Української медичної стоматологічної академії · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicPain Management and Placebo Effect
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMorningVisual analogue scalePersistence (discontinuity)McGill Pain QuestionnaireChronic painPhysical therapyAnesthesiaInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Changes in neurohumoral regulation and emotional perception of nociceptive impulses in elderly and senile patients result in some clinical peculiarities of pain syndrome manifestation. Recent studies have shown that more than 10% of geriatric patients experience pain not only as an irritant but also as a psychosomatic condition. Persistence of pain in the postoperative period in the elderly and senile patients can turn into its catastrophic and chronic character in the future thus impacting the quality of life of patients and increasing the health care economic expenses to provide the proper chronic pain management. Therefore, the aim of this study is to determine the main predictors of pain persistence in the elderly and senile patients in the late postoperative period. The study included 201 male and female patients who underwent surgery regardless of surgical profile. All patients were divided into 3 groups according to age: group 1 (n = 82) included the elderly individuals, group 2 (n = 21) included senile individuals, and the control group (n = 98) included the adult patients. To evaluate the presence and severity of pain syndrome, pain assessment was performed by applying 100-score visual-analog scale in 1 and 7 days. A detailed study of the perception of postoperative pain was performed by the McGill questionnaire, which was used only on day 7, because on day 1 patients could be weakened after surgery, and the results distorted by the action of drugs. All examined patients were measured for fasting cortisol in the morning on the 1st and 7th day. The blood collection procedure was performed according to the general requirements for medical and biological tests. Blood was drawn from a vein by a nurse in the direct presence of a doctor. The serum cortisol content was determined using a set of reagents for quantitative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The study has demonstrated that age, score on the visual-analog scale and the evaluation scale of the McGill questionnaire for day 7, as well as blood cortisol concentration in day 1 after surgery are of definite prognostic value for the risk of persistence of postoperative pain syndrome. The chance of persistence of postoperative pain increases in 1.1 times for each year in older patients, 1.3 times for each score according to the visual-analog scale for 7 days, and in 11.4 times for each score on the evaluation scale of the McGill questionnaire, and in 2.4 times for each nmol/l of cortisol concentration in 1 day after surgery. Thus, the determined risk factors for persistence of postoperative pain include the patient's age, assessment of pain by applying a visual-analog scale, and the evaluation scale by the McGill questionnaire for 7 days and the concentration of blood cortisol in 1 day after surgery.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueАктуальні проблеми сучасної медицини Вісник Української медичної стоматологічної академіїSame topicPain Management and Placebo EffectFrench-language works237,207