MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4205871234 · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2021.807839

Focusing on Comorbidity—A Novel Meta-Analytic Approach and Protocol to Disentangle the Specific Neuroanatomy of Co-occurring Mental Disorders

2022· article· en· W4205871234 on OpenAlexaff
Lydia Fortea, Anton Albajes‐Eizagirre, Yuan‐Wei Yao, Edu Soler, Norma Verdolini, Alexander O. Hauson, Adriana Fortea, Santiago Madero, Aleix Solanes, Scott C. Wollman, Maria Serra-Blasco, Toby Wise, Steve Lukito, Maria Picó‐Pérez, Christina Carlisi, Jintao Zhang, PingLei Pan, Àlvar Farré‐Colomés, Danilo Arnone, Matthew J. Kempton, Carles Soriano‐Mas, Katya Rubia, Luke Norman, Paolo Fusar‐Poli, David Mataix‐Cols, Marc Valentí, Esther Via, Narcı́s Cardoner, Marco Solmi, Jae Il Shin, Eduard Vieta, Joaquim Raduà

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Psychiatry · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies
Canadian institutionsOttawa HospitalUniversity of Ottawa
FundersEuropean CommissionInstituto de Salud Carlos III“la Caixa” FoundationHorizon 2020 Framework ProgrammeWellcome Trust
KeywordsComorbidityNeuroanatomyPsychologyProtocol (science)PsychiatryClinical psychologyNeuroscienceCognitive psychologyMedicineAlternative medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: In mental health, comorbidities are the norm rather than the exception. However, current meta-analytic methods for summarizing the neural correlates of mental disorders do not consider comorbidities, reducing them to a source of noise and bias rather than benefitting from their valuable information. OBJECTIVES: We describe and validate a novel neuroimaging meta-analytic approach that focuses on comorbidities. In addition, we present the protocol for a meta-analysis of all major mental disorders and their comorbidities. METHODS: The novel approach consists of a modification of Seed-based d Mapping-with Permutation of Subject Images (SDM-PSI) in which the linear models have no intercept. As in previous SDM meta-analyses, the dependent variable is the brain anatomical difference between patients and controls in a voxel. However, there is no primary disorder, and the independent variables are the percentages of patients with each disorder and each pair of potentially comorbid disorders. We use simulations to validate and provide an example of this novel approach, which correctly disentangled the abnormalities associated with each disorder and comorbidity. We then describe a protocol for conducting the new meta-analysis of all major mental disorders and their comorbidities. Specifically, we will include all voxel-based morphometry (VBM) studies of mental disorders for which a meta-analysis has already been published, including at least 10 studies. We will use the novel approach to analyze all included studies in two separate single linear models, one for children/adolescents and one for adults. DISCUSSION: The novel approach is a valid method to focus on comorbidities. The meta-analysis will yield a comprehensive atlas of the neuroanatomy of all major mental disorders and their comorbidities, which we hope might help develop potential diagnostic and therapeutic tools.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.195
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.334
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.195
Threshold uncertainty score0.993

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.1950.334
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.020
Bibliometrics0.0050.006
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0040.005
Research integrity0.0050.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in PsychiatrySame topicFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesFrench-language works237,207