Preventing cognitive decline in older adults with mild cognitive impairment using integrated Korean and Western treatments: Initial results
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Despite the rapidly rising incidence of cognitive impairment, no current medications have proven effective for mild cognitive impairment (MCI). The Integrated dementia clinic at Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital is a nationally recognized Korean‐Western (KW) clinic that provides the integrated medical service via co‐consultation by both neurologists and Korean medicine neuropsychologists. Objective The purpose of this study is to examine whether the integrated KW treatment prevents cognitive decline in patients with MCI as measured by changes in the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores over time. Method We retrospectively examined the medical records of patients from May 2015 to June 2020. Of 19 patients who were diagnosed as MCI, twelve MCI patients underwent MMSE at their initial visit to the clinic and at least once more over a period of up to 5 years. These twelve MCI patients divided into two groups: MMSE improvement group vs. MMSE worsening group. We performed the Wilcoxon rank sum test to compare the group achieving improvement in MMSE to decrease in MMSE. We also used the same test to assess the difference in the median length of follow‐up between the two groups. Result The prevalence of MCI seen during the review period was 23% (19/82). The baseline characteristics of patients with MCI were shown in Table 1. Among those twelve MCI patients who received integrated KW treatment, 67 % (8/12) of them achieved improvement in MMSE score, which was statistically significant (p‐value = 0.008) compared to those showing a decrease in MMSE score while the length of follow‐up was not significantly different between the two groups. The detailed treatment and changes in MMSE presented in Table 2. For treatment from Western medicine, anticonvulsants were most commonly prescribed, and donepezil was given to 63%. Acupuncture (100%), Moxibustion (100%), and herbal medicine (Gagam‐sohabhwangwon: 6/8,62.5 %) were most prescribed Korean medicine. Conclusions This study demonstrates, for the first time, that integrated KW treatment positively affects cognitive function in MCI patients with increases in MMSE scores over time. Further research with a larger data set, needs to be conducted to validate the effectiveness of integrative approach.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".