MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4205903677 · doi:10.22215/etd/2021-14689

Attenuated Alpha Backgrounds in the DEAP-3600 Dark Matter Search Experiment

2021· dissertation· en· W4205903677 on OpenAlexaff
P. DelGobbo

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicDark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWIMPDark matterPhysicsWeakly interacting massive particlesScintillationParticle physicsNuclear physicsAstrophysicsDetectorScalar field dark matterOpticsCosmologyDark energy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

DEAP-3600 is a dark matter experiment using 3.3 tonnes of liquid argon as a scintillation target to directly detect Weakly Interacting Massive Particles (WIMPs), a dark matter candidate.Mitigating background sources is crucial to dark matter searches.A large background model contribution comes from attenuated alphas originating from 210 Po decays within the acrylic vessel surfaces.Alphas from decays within the acrylic inner vessel and from the acrylic neck flowguide are analyzed.The activity of the inner vessel is separated into surface and bulk components, and determined to be 0.22 ± 0.02 mBq/m 2 and 3.68 ± 0.06 mBq.An event rate of 53.5 +30 -4.6 µHz is found for alphas originating from the neck flowguide.An optimized event selection is obtained, making use of machine-learning algorithms to reject neck flowguide alphas and maximize WIMP sensitivity.In 802 live-days of DEAP-3600 data, the expected upper limit on the spin-independent WIMP-nucleon interaction cross-section is 1.9×10 -45 cm 2 (90% C.L.) for a 100 GeV/c 2 WIMP mass.D&D nights and mid-day Catan sessions kept me alive during this entire process, and this thesis would likely sound like the words of a madman without all three of you.Most importantly, I want to thank my parents.I am incredibly lucky to have such supportive and caring parents, who were there for me through this whole process.You taught me how to put my full effort into my work, never give up, and be proud of my accomplishments.That knowledge is the most important lesson I have learned in my life.I will always be grateful for your unconditional love.And to Shawna.It is incredible to me that you can somehow manage your own Masters, a full time job, and all of my nonsense, but you do, and I am grateful every day that you are with me.You are the rock in my life, and the first person I go to when I am excited or nervous.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena→French-language works237,207→