MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4205931832 · doi:10.1002/alz.057871

Concerns of older adults during second COVID wave in India

2021· article· en· W4205931832 on OpenAlexaff
Meenakshi Chopra, Jayashree Dasgupta

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicCOVID-19 and Mental Health
Canadian institutionsHealth Care Foundation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThematic analysisMental healthCoping (psychology)Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)MedicinePandemicPsychologyFamily medicineGerontologyPsychiatryQualitative researchDiseaseInfectious disease (medical specialty)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background A second wave of COVID infections in India, lockdown, restriction on services, and strain on an unprepared health system has had significant impact on older adults. It is important to examine impact of the lockdown on the elderly and their caregivers, useful coping strategies and requirements for support going forwards. Method As part of an ongoing community engagement initiative with older adults, an online survey was conducted in 2020 during the first wave of the pandemic investigating mental health and wellbeing of older adults. Participants who shared details were contacted one year later to understand impact of the second COIVD wave on their wellbeing and coping. An in‐depth telephonic interview was conducted and General Health Questionnaire 5 item were used for data collection. Audio consent was taken prior to interviews which were recorded and transcribed for thematic analysis. Result Out of 58 participants who shared contact details, 16 % (N=9) agreed to participate in the interview. about 40 % refused mentioning they were unwell/ too busy/or agreed to speak at a later date. One female and 8 males participated in the interview between the ages of 36 to 83 years. All participants held post graduate/ professional degrees. 33 % (N=3) participants obtained a GHQ score of 2 and above on the five item General Health Questionnaire indicating presence of depressive features. As compared to the first lockdown, older adults found the second lockdown more stressful due to deaths of close friends and family members. Increased fears about family members with comorbidities contracting the virus, difficulties managing emotional wellbeing, and challenges helping younger family members manage their routines and follow basic COVID protocols were key concerns. Coping strategies found useful were remaining active and engaged at home, attending online mental wellness sessions, practicing yoga/ meditation and spending time with friends/family. Older adults highlighted a need for more emotional support through creation of social media networks and online platforms. Conclusion Preliminary findings from this study emphasize a need for leveraging technology to support emotional wellbeing of older adults during lockdown and COVID restrictions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.067

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.361
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicCOVID-19 and Mental Health→French-language works237,207→