P.088 Dysautonomia and Diabetes: A Prodrome to Fatal Familial Insomnia (FFI)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Fatal Familial Insomnia (FFI) is an autosomal dominant multisystem prion disease, with sleep disorders often being the first presentation. Although autonomic dysfunctions are key features, the frequency and timing vary between reports, and may accompany early insomnia. Moreover, endocrine changes are reported, but diabetes rarely is - with unclear timing of onset in relation to the insomnia. Methods: N/A Results: Here we present a 46-year-old previously healthy male, who within 22 months prior to the onset of sleep disturbances, developed hypertension and diabetes. Then within 3-4 months after onset of sleep disturbances development tachycardia and diaphoresis. His sleep continued to deteriorate, and later developed bulbar impairment, ataxia, diplopia, sleep apnea and cognitive decline. He passed away 20 months from onset of insomnia. Polysomnography showed status dissociates and central apnea. He had positive genetic testing, PRNP c.532G>A (p.Asp178Asn) and PRNP c.385A>G (pMet129Val), a pathological confirmation, and a positive family history Conclusions: Here diabetes and hypertension significantly preceded sleep disturbances, and tachycardia and diaphoresis developed shortly after. This illustrates that dysautonomia and endocrine dysfunction may be unrecognized prodromes in some cases of FFI, and could be an early marker of clinical disease onset and therapeutic interventions, especially in genetically confirmed asymptotic patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".