Dynamic response analysis of Euler–Bernoulli beam on spatially random transversely isotropic viscoelastic soil
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A novel dynamic soil-structure interaction model is developed for analysis for Euler–Bernoulli beam rests on a spatially random transversely isotropic viscoelastic foundation subjected to moving and oscillating loads. The dynamic equilibrium equation of beam-soil system is established using the extended Hamilton's principle, and the corresponding partial differential equations describing the displacement of beam and soil and boundary conditions are further obtained by the variational principles. These partial differential equations are discretized in spatial and time domains and solved by the finite difference (FD) method. After the differential equations of beam and soil are discretized in the spatial domain, the implicit iterative scheme is used to solve the equations in the time domain. The solving result shows the FD method is effective and convenient for solving the differential equations of beam-soil system. The spring foundation model adopted the modified Vlasov model, which is a two-parameter model considering the compression and shear of soil. The advantage of the present foundation model is avoided estimating input parameters of the modified Vlasov model using prior knowledge. The present solution is verified by publishing solution and equivalent three-dimensional FE analysis. The present model produced an accurate, faster, and effective displacement response. A few examples are carried out to analyze the parameter variation influence for beam on spatially random transversely isotropic viscoelastic soil under moving loads.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".