MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4205964829 · doi:10.5339/jemtac.2022.qhc.28

Integrated Trauma Anesthesia Service Pathway for Level I Trauma Center – Qatar Experience

2022· article· en· W4205964829 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Muthusamy Thevar Sevugapandian Vijay Jeganath, Ahamed Lafir Aliyar, Senthilkumar Muthu, Mohamad Hilani, Hassan Al Thani

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of emergency medicine, trauma & acute care · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTrauma centerMedicineAccreditationMajor traumaAnesthesiologyTrauma carePenetrating traumaMedical emergencyEmergency medicineObservational studyService (business)AnesthesiaRetrospective cohort studySurgeryInternal medicineMedical education

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background : The Level 1 Trauma Center at Hamad General Hospital (HGH) offers world-class trauma services for Qatar, which also boasts the coveted Trauma Distinction Accreditation 1 award by Accreditation Canada. Consequently, HGH is expected to meet the Level 1 service specifications, which requires that an anesthetist should respond to Trauma 1 (T1) call within 15 minutes. Unfortunately, it was reported that this was not achieved in HGH, failing to fulfill the required compliance standard. In response to this, a new Trauma Anesthesia service was implemented, involving a pathway to deliver a 24/7 service by a designated team of Trauma Anesthetists taking part in all phases of trauma care (resuscitation, diagnosis, and treatment) 2,3 (Figure 1). This submission aims to describe the impact of this new service in providing timely care to trauma patients and thus meeting accreditation standards. Methods : This is a retrospective observational study primarily looking at the response time of the trauma anesthetists following a T1 call, which was recorded by the trauma nurses. Furthermore, the total number of trauma calls, proportional with T1 calls, and the number of trauma patients requiring anesthetic services were also collected. Data was collected from the Qatar Trauma Registry during the first six months (April to September 2020) of the new service. This data was then tabulated, analyzed, and expressed as a percentage (Table 1). Results/Findings : The study found that the service achieved a 100% (145) compliance rate for T1 anesthetic response time of 15 minutes. A total of 1029 trauma patients presented to HGH during the study period, of which 15% (145) were T1 admissions and about 10% (103) required surgical intervention. 25% (36) of T1 patients required anesthetic intervention. Conclusion : A 24/7 designated trauma anesthesia service provides high standards and continuity of care to trauma patients. The key anesthetic performance indicator for trauma accreditation was met.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of emergency medicine, trauma & acute careSame topicCardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical OutcomesFrench-language works237,207