Construction and Analysis of a Yeast cDNA Library from <i>Medicago truncatula</i>
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Yeast two-hybrid and one-hybrid technologies are an efficient molecular biology technique for screening protein interactions or protein and DNA interactions, and are an important means for the interaction and regulation of biological macromolecules. In order to obtain a high-capacity Medicago truncatula gene library, it provides a basis for further digging the related genes of Medicago truncatula and improving the quality of Medicago truncatula . In this study, Medicago truncatula from different tissue sources was selected, and different hormone induction or stress treatments were performed on Medicago truncatula , using SMART technology to successfully construct a high-capacity Medicago truncatula yeast hybrid cDNA library. The library quality test results showed that the library titration number was 5×10 7 CFU/mL, the library capacity was 1.28×10 7 CFU, and the average insert fragment length was greater than 1 000 bp. All 24 clones were able to amplify bands, and the cDNA fragment recombination rate was 100%. The library has high quality and complete genetic information, which meets the requirements of yeast hybrid screening test, and can be applied to the research of gene expression regulation of Medicago truncatula and the screening test of interaction protein.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it