Penyelenggaraan Operasional Anggota Patroli Jalan Raya dalam Melaksanakan Tugas Pengawalan VVIP Maupun VIP di Wilayah Hukum Polda Bali Menurut Undang-undang Nomor 22 Tahun 2009
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the jurisdiction of the Bali Police, there are also VIP and VVIP escorts which are special escorts from the Police for working visits of government officials visiting the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia. In carrying out these mentoring activities, it must be in accordance with the established Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). This study aimed to examine the legal arrangements regarding the security of escorts carried out by Polri members on the way to their destination and reveal the sanctions received by Polri members in carrying out escorts that are not in accordance with Standard Operating Procedures. This study used a normative legal approach to problems and legislation. Sources of data used were primary data and secondary data obtained through reading and taking notes. Furthermore, the data were analyzed descriptively qualitatively. The results of the study indicated that the right to escort is also regulated in Law No. 22 of 2009 Article 134 concerning Road Traffic and Transportation. Sanctions received by Polri members who do not enforce discipline in escort are contained in Government Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 2 of 2003 concerning Discipline of Polri Members or sanctions for violating the implementation of Polri's professional code of ethics as regulated in National Police Chief Regulation Number 14 of 2011 concerning Polri's Professional Code of Ethics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.031 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".