MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4205993681 · doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2021.109185

Diabetes and Ramadan: Practical guidelines 2021

2022· review· en· W4205993681 on OpenAlexaff
Mohamed Hassanein, Bachar Afandi, Muhammad Yakoob Ahmedani, Reem Alamoudi, Fatheya Alawadi, Harpreet S. Bajaj, Abdul Basit, Abdullah Bennakhi, Adel A. El Sayed, Osama Hamdy, Wasim Hanif, Abdul Jabbar, Line Kleinebreil, Nader Lessan, Inass Shaltout, Wan Mohamad Wan Bebakar, Elamin Abdelgadir, Sarah Abdo, Ebaa Al‐Ozairi, Yousef Al‐Saleh, Monira Alarouj, Tomader Ali, Abdulrazzaq Al-Madani, Samir H. Assaad‐Khalil, Alaaeldin Mohammed K. Bashier, Salem Beshyah, Mehmet Akif Büyükbeşe, Tahseen A Chowdhury, S.N. Diop, Nancy Samir Elbarbary, Tarik Elhadd, Fatimah Eliana, MoezAlIslam E. Faris, Khadija Hafidh, Zanariah Hussein, H. Iraqi, Walid Kaplan, Tayyab Khan, Kamlesh Khunti, Salma Maher, Rachid Malek, Rayaz A. Malik, Mafauzy Mohamed, Mesbah Sayed Kamel Mohamed, Nazeer Ahmed Mohamed, Sameer A. Pathan, Fouzia Rashid, Rakesh Sahay, Bashir Salih, Mohamad A. Sandid, Shehla Shaikh, I. Slim, Khaled Tayeb, Barakatun Nisak Mohd Yusof, Sueziani Binte Zainudin

Bibliographic record

VenueDiabetes Research and Clinical Practice · 2022
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDietary Effects on Health
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityLMC Diabetes & Endocrinology (Canada)
FundersBarts CharityServierSanofi
KeywordsMedicineDiabetes mellitusAllianceDiabetes managementType 2 diabetesFamily medicineEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.064

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.003
Bibliometrics0.0090.007
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.525
GPT teacher head0.650
Teacher spread0.124 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations212
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueDiabetes Research and Clinical PracticeSame topicDietary Effects on HealthFrench-language works237,207